Mark Thomas wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
So far, there are 3 binding votes for stable (with one from an inactive
committer), and 1 for beta. While a beta or stable release could lega
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
>> [ ] Broken
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [X] Stable
>
> So far, there are 3 binding votes for stable (with one from an inactive
> committer), and 1 for beta. While a beta or stable release could legal
Markus Schönhaber wrote:
BTW: Should I open reports in Bugzilla for the things above or would that be
an overkill?
Those issues come from merging the two examples webapps into one. I
think it's ok if you create one bug report listing all these issues.
Rémy
--
Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> I have stumbled upon some trivial glitches:
One more: all the source codes for the JSP examples (*.jsp.html, *.jspx.html,
*.tag.html, *.java.html) seem to be missing. The URLs pointing to them look
correct but the files are not there.
Regards
mks
-
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
> [X] Stable
I haven't tested the new features like NIO neither have I noticed the CL
issue, you mention in another post so I can't say anything about those parts
of 6.0.10.
I have stumbled upon som
Tim Funk wrote:
Minor (non show stopper) issues:
- /manager/html-manager-howto.html is missing
- /manager/manager-howto.html is missing
I missed that.
- The default welcome page has a bad link to /tomcat-docs instead of docs
The default page at the moment should be index.html now (not index
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
There are some issues with NIO, as well as a CL glitch (which does not
Minor (non show stopper) issues:
- /manager/html-manager-howto.html is missing
- /manager/manager-howto.html is missing
- The default welcome page has a bad link to /tomcat-docs instead of docs
I'm OK with stable since it looks suitable for production use in many
scenarios.
-Tim
Remy Mauchera
I'll give it a whirl. I'm in the process of getting some new servers
which can actually run java5. (Thus modernizing me to 2003)
-Tim
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
According to the (slightl
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
So far, there are 3 binding votes for stable (with one from an inactiv
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
Sorry guys and g
Hi,
On 2/20/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry guys and girls, I messed up and have a memory leak in the NIO
> connector.
> Fixing it right now.
I respect your vote. However, it's not going to change my opinion on
this build, since it's obvious some issue is going to be found
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
Sorry guys and girls, I messed up and h
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[X] Beta
[ ] Stable
Sorry guys and girls, I messed up and have a memory leak in the NIO
co
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Only three votes so far. Any additional votes after testing it ?
Rémy
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Rémy
---
On 2/16/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
---
Hola,
On 2/16/07, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ X ] Stable
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
[X] Stable
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Note: in particular, this build includes (safe) optimizations in Jaspe
Candidate binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.10/
According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-
21 matches
Mail list logo
