Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-23 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 12/23/2009 01:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: On 23/12/2009 08:55, jean-frederic clere wrote: On 12/22/2009 09:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Servlet TCK passes JSP TCK passes - 1 failure This one, however, can't be ignored. Remy hinted at it early today. The fix for bug 47453 created a regression in

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-23 Thread Mark Thomas
On 23/12/2009 08:55, jean-frederic clere wrote: > On 12/22/2009 09:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> Servlet TCK passes >> JSP TCK passes - 1 failure >> >> This one, however, can't be ignored. Remy hinted at it early today. The >> fix for bug 47453 created a regression in that the constraint expressed >

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-23 Thread Mladen Turk
On 12/23/2009 11:59 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: So I suggest we try that for TC 7 and find out how to do that in a good way (or not) before we try with 6.0. Let's stick to the existing process for 6.0 and do the experiments with 7. We can easily make a script similar to the one we have for mod_jk

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-23 Thread Rainer Jung
On 23.12.2009 10:33, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2009/12/23 Mladen Turk: On 12/23/2009 02:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: release candidates (marking the files with rcX or dev or whatever) the only safe thing would be to burn version number 6.0.21 and go for 6.0.22. +1 Let's make a proper release.

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-23 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2009/12/23 Mladen Turk : > On 12/23/2009 02:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: >> >> release candidates (marking the files with rcX or dev or whatever) the >> only safe thing would be to burn version number 6.0.21 and go for 6.0.22. >> > > +1 > > Let's make a proper release. +1 > > I'd suggest to make a r

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-23 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 12/23/2009 02:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: On 23.12.2009 00:45, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2009/12/22 Mark Thomas: (...) Since we are going to have to re-tag anyway, it would be good if the patches required to fix the various niggles above were applied before the tag. Mark +1 to re-tag. And

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-23 Thread jean-frederic clere
On 12/22/2009 09:27 PM, Mark Thomas wrote: Servlet TCK passes JSP TCK passes - 1 failure This one, however, can't be ignored. Remy hinted at it early today. The fix for bug 47453 created a regression in that the constraint expressed in JSP.2.3.4 namely thatA String literal can be provided, as lo

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-22 Thread Mladen Turk
On 12/23/2009 02:12 AM, Rainer Jung wrote: release candidates (marking the files with rcX or dev or whatever) the only safe thing would be to burn version number 6.0.21 and go for 6.0.22. +1 Let's make a proper release. I'd suggest to make a release on a specific SVN revision instead tag. Th

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-22 Thread Rainer Jung
On 23.12.2009 00:45, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: 2009/12/22 Mark Thomas: (...) Since we are going to have to re-tag anyway, it would be good if the patches required to fix the various niggles above were applied before the tag. Mark +1 to re-tag. And I would like the fix to 47413 to be included

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-22 Thread Konstantin Kolinko
2009/12/22 Mark Thomas : >(...) > Since we are going to have to re-tag anyway, it would be good if the > patches required to fix the various niggles above were applied before > the tag. > > Mark +1 to re-tag. And I would like the fix to 47413 to be included in it. Patch already proposed, though t

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-22 Thread Mark Thomas
On 22/12/2009 20:38, A. Weinert wrote: > Hi all, > > full install of > 22.12.2009 17:32 6.865.003 apache-tomcat-6.0.21.exe > on actual XP home won't even start with: > > 22.12.2009 21:19:46 org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester startElement > SCHWERWIEGEND: Begin event threw exception

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-22 Thread Mark Thomas
On 22/12/2009 20:27, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 22/12/2009 16:11, jean-frederic clere wrote: >> The candidates binaries are available here: >> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21-try2/ >> >> According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is: >> [X] Broken >> [ ] Alpha >> [ ] Beta >> [

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-22 Thread A. Weinert
Hi all, full install of 22.12.2009 17:32 6.865.003 apache-tomcat-6.0.21.exe on actual XP home won't even start with: 22.12.2009 21:19:46 org.apache.tomcat.util.digester.Digester startElement SCHWERWIEGEND: Begin event threw exception java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.apache.catalin

Re: [VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-22 Thread Mark Thomas
On 22/12/2009 16:11, jean-frederic clere wrote: > The candidates binaries are available here: > http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21-try2/ > > According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is: > [X] Broken > [ ] Alpha > [ ] Beta > [ ] Stable > > The differences are only the tcnativ

[VOTE] Release build 6.0.21 (try 2)

2009-12-22 Thread jean-frederic clere
The candidates binaries are available here: http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.21-try2/ According to the release process, the 6.0.21 tag is: [ ] Broken [ ] Alpha [ ] Beta [ ] Stable The differences are only the tcnative windows binary files: tcnative was broken in the previous try.