On 04/03/2010 07:49, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> On 03/04/2010 04:04 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
>> Hi, any plan when will 6.0.26 released? Our project has a dependency on it..
>
> There is still a regression to vote (and test): bug 48827.
> If no other problems the release should happen early next week.
>> A dependency on an 'unreleased' product ?
>
> I think he means Apache Geronimo.
Ah yes.
Sorry :)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomcat.apache.org
Thanks!
2010/3/4 jean-frederic clere
> On 03/04/2010 04:04 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
> > Hi, any plan when will 6.0.26 released? Our project has a dependency on
> it..
>
> There is still a regression to vote (and test): bug 48827.
> If no other problems the release should happen early next week.
>
>
On 3/4/10 3:13 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
A dependency on an 'unreleased' product ?
I think he means Apache Geronimo.
Bill
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomca
A dependency on an 'unreleased' product ?
Le 4 mars 2010 à 04:04, Rex Wang a écrit :
Hi, any plan when will 6.0.26 released? Our project has a dependency
on it..
Thanks
-Rex
2010/3/3 Mladen Turk
On 03/03/2010 08:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Stable [3]
Broken [2]
So we go for a
On 03/04/2010 04:04 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
> Hi, any plan when will 6.0.26 released? Our project has a dependency on it..
There is still a regression to vote (and test): bug 48827.
If no other problems the release should happen early next week.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
>
> Thanks
>
> -Rex
>
> 2010/
Hi, any plan when will 6.0.26 released? Our project has a dependency on it..
Thanks
-Rex
2010/3/3 Mladen Turk
> On 03/03/2010 08:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
>
>> Stable [3]
>> Broken [2]
>>
>> So we go for a 6.0.26. Please commit the stuff voted in STATUS.txt
>>
>>
> And few ones that ne
On 03/03/2010 08:33 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
Stable [3]
Broken [2]
So we go for a 6.0.26. Please commit the stuff voted in STATUS.txt
And few ones that need votes :)
E.g the trivial exception throwing fix for APR connector on shutdown.
Regards
--
^TM
--
Stable [3]
Broken [2]
So we go for a 6.0.26. Please commit the stuff voted in STATUS.txt
Comments?
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tomc
On 02/24/2010 11:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
If the release is postponed I'd like to add the
legacy renegotiation support from trunk.
It requires tomcat-native 1.2.21 release first
with compil
2010/2/27 Konstantin Kolinko :
> 2010/2/24 jean-frederic clere :
>> The candidates binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
>>
>> According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
>> [x] Broken
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4882
2010/2/24 jean-frederic clere :
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
> [x] Broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48827
Showstopper.
By the way: I have not a
On 24/02/2010 10:56, jean-frederic clere wrote:
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
PGP signatures all match
Key in web of trust
.exe instal
On 02/25/2010 01:07 PM, Tim Funk wrote:
> So far all looks OK - but due to the version issue - I vote:
> [X] Broken
>
> I believe rebuilding with an updated properties (no retag needed) should
> fix the issue.
Yep it is just a packaging problem.
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
---
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
>
> According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ X ] Stable
My usual testing with a coupl
So far all looks OK - but due to the version issue - I vote:
[X] Broken
I believe rebuilding with an updated properties (no retag needed) should
fix the issue.
-Tim
On 2/25/2010 6:07 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2010/2/24 jean-frederic clere:
The candidates binaries are available here:
h
2010/2/24 jean-frederic clere :
> The candidates binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
>
org/apache/catalina/util/ServerInfo.properties:
server.info=Apache Tomcat/6.0.25
server.number=6.0.0.0
server.built=February 24 2010 1107
6.0.24, 23 also had "6.0
On 02/24/2010 11:56 AM, jean-frederic clere wrote:
According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Checked on windows and linux.
You might wish to add the note about known issue
Windows exception thrown on shutdown
SEVERE: Socket accept failed.
T
The candidates binaries are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jfclere/tomcat-6/v6.0.25/
According to the release process, the 6.0.25 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] Stable
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To unsubscribe
19 matches
Mail list logo