Re: [taglibs] Site plans

2013-07-06 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Jul 6, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > On Jul 2, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >>> >>> I wouldn't expect to deploy the site from tags - a site is a live/current >>> thing. >> >> The core site is a live/current thing, b

Re: [taglibs] Site plans

2013-07-06 Thread Henri Yandell
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > On Jul 2, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > I wouldn't expect to deploy the site from tags - a site is a live/current > > thing. > > The core site is a live/current thing, but there is also the > documentation/reports etc. that

Re: [taglibs] Site plans

2013-07-02 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Jul 2, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > I wouldn't expect to deploy the site from tags - a site is a live/current > thing. The core site is a live/current thing, but there is also the documentation/reports etc. that would be associated with a specific tag. IOW, the site could cont

Re: [taglibs] Site plans

2013-07-02 Thread Henri Yandell
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Olivier Lamy wrote: > Apologize for delayed response. > > 2013/6/26 Jeremy Boynes : > > On Jun 25, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > >> Help much appreciated - but do we want all the content of all the > modules > >> to be there? > >> > >> It feels to m

Re: [taglibs] Site plans

2013-07-01 Thread Olivier Lamy
Apologize for delayed response. 2013/6/26 Jeremy Boynes : > On Jun 25, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > >> Help much appreciated - but do we want all the content of all the modules >> to be there? >> >> It feels to me that the website does not map directly to the codebase. We >> want an o

Re: [taglibs] Site plans

2013-06-25 Thread Jeremy Boynes
On Jun 25, 2013, at 7:54 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > Help much appreciated - but do we want all the content of all the modules > to be there? > > It feels to me that the website does not map directly to the codebase. We > want an overall site, and subsites for Standard and for RDC. We don't want

Re: [taglibs] Site plans

2013-06-25 Thread Henri Yandell
Help much appreciated - but do we want all the content of all the modules to be there? It feels to me that the website does not map directly to the codebase. We want an overall site, and subsites for Standard and for RDC. We don't want to have the 14 pom.xmls become a site structure, or the 4 pom.

Re: [taglibs] Site plans

2013-06-24 Thread Olivier Lamy
Hi, Can be easy :-) mvn site site:stage and all the content of all modules will be in ${project.build.directory}/staging (target/staging). But to achieve this and having something easy we must the site module on the top! Means here http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/taglibs/trunks/ As we don't

[taglibs] Site plans

2013-06-23 Thread Henri Yandell
FYI that I'm digging into the Taglibs site to figure out how it is we go from 15 Maven target/site directories to 1 site. I'm then going to write a dumb shell script that copies the relevant parts to a Tomcat site/taglibs checkout, allowing for the site to be updated. I'm sure there's a very cleve