On 21/05/2013 23:42, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Finally trying to find some time to review this...
1) Is there an intent to put [4] into some version-controlled place?
E.g. webapps/docs/architecture/ ?
Or essentials of it will be included as part of config/context.html ?
I see some rows
Mark,
On 5/17/13 3:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 16/05/2013 21:50, Mark Thomas wrote:
The final (for now) changes are:
1. unpackWARs now applies to external WARs as well as WARs located in
the Host's appBase.
2. If a WAR is modified (located in the Host's appBase or externally)
and
Mark,
On 5/17/13 3:25 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/05/2013 20:22, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: Automatic deployment changes
3. A warning is generate if a DIR in the appBase is ignored because
there is a matching WAR and unpackWARs
On 22/05/2013 17:48, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 5/17/13 3:04 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
4. Adding an XML or WAR when just a DIR exists will trigger a
redeploy. If a WAR is added and unpackWARs==true, the DIR will be
replaced.
5. If a WAR or DIR is added to an XML, a reload will
On 22/05/2013 17:50, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 5/17/13 3:25 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/05/2013 20:22, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Subject: Re:
Automatic deployment changes
3. A warning is generate if a DIR in the appBase is ignored
2013/5/7 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
There have been a few queries [1], [2] recently and there is a long
standard enhancement request [3] regarding automatic deployment.
What has made changes in this area difficult in the past is a) a lack of
a clear definition as to what the expected
On 16/05/2013 21:50, Mark Thomas wrote:
The final (for now) changes are:
1. unpackWARs now applies to external WARs as well as WARs located in
the Host's appBase.
2. If a WAR is modified (located in the Host's appBase or externally)
and there is a context.xml file present in the Host's
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: Automatic deployment changes
3. A warning is generate if a DIR in the appBase is ignored because
there is a matching WAR and unpackWARs==false.
The doc at [1] contains this statement:
Note: After deployment, if both a WAR and a DIR
On 17/05/2013 20:22, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: Automatic deployment changes
3. A warning is generate if a DIR in the appBase is ignored because
there is a matching WAR and unpackWARs==false.
The doc at [1] contains this statement
The changes have changed. The new changes are:
1. unpackWARs now applies to external WARs as well as WARs located in
the Host's appBase.
2. If a WAR is modified (located in the Host's appBase or externally)
and there is a context.xml file present in the Host's appBase (which
there must be for
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: Automatic deployment changes
2. If a WAR is modified (located in the Host's appBase or externally)
and there is a context.xml file present in the Host's appBase (which
there must be for external WARs)
Just to be clear, do you mean
On 16/05/2013 22:05, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Subject: Re: Automatic deployment changes
2. If a WAR is modified (located in the Host's appBase or externally)
and there is a context.xml file present in the Host's appBase (which
there must
On 14/05/2013 20:55, Christopher Schultz wrote:
On 5/13/13 3:35 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I've updated the proposal to cover these.
Cool. Having all the rules in one place will be tremendously helpful to
users. Even if they disagree with the rules, they will at least be
predictable without
I have been implementing tests for the proposed behaviour [1] and I have
found the first difference between the current and the proposed
behaviour. Given there have been no objections to [1], I intend to align
8.0.x's behaviour with the proposal. As I find differences I will update
this list to
Mark,
On 5/13/13 3:35 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 08/05/2013 15:18, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Perhaps I should clarify my question with an example: what happens
when a WAR file is found and a DIR also exists with the same
context name, but expandWars is false? Does the directory get
updated
Mark,
On 5/7/13 5:05 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 07/05/2013 21:13, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 5/7/13 8:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
In an attempt to improve the situation, I have tried to document
a proposed expected behaviour [4].
Cool. Two question:
1. What is the difference
There have been a few queries [1], [2] recently and there is a long
standard enhancement request [3] regarding automatic deployment.
What has made changes in this area difficult in the past is a) a lack of
a clear definition as to what the expected behaviour is and b) a lack of
test cases to
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 13:54 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
What has made changes in this area difficult in the past is a) a lack of
a clear definition as to what the expected behaviour is and b) a lack of
test cases to validate that behaviour.
a) is very true ...
Anyway, I think it's very good to
Mark,
On 5/7/13 8:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
In an attempt to improve the situation, I have tried to document a
proposed expected behaviour [4].
Cool. Two question:
1. What is the difference between Y/N and - in a column? Y/N seems
to mean does not matter. Does - mean does not apply? If both
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/05/2013 21:13, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 5/7/13 8:54 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
In an attempt to improve the situation, I have tried to document
a proposed expected behaviour [4].
Cool. Two question:
1. What is the difference
20 matches
Mail list logo
