My only thought was the single-source value. If it would be a lot of
extra work to do the text file, then I think the original design is fine.
Mitch
On 10/02/2018 09:56 AM, Marek Czernek wrote:
Well, I personally would prefer if it was a soure-able (or call-able
for windows) script; otherwi
Well, I personally would prefer if it was a soure-able (or call-able
for windows) script; otherwise, you'd have to parse the text file to
check which part of the text you want to output, since you don't want to
output all the text at once, but only for one particular verb.
Any particular bene
Are the available verbs the same for both .sh and .bat? If so, perhaps a
text file that contains the actual help text that could be output from
both .bat and .sh.
Mitch
On 10/01/2018 02:48 PM, Marek Czernek wrote:
Hi there,
I'd like to resolve Bug 62140 [0]. I just wanted to gather some opi
Hi there,
I'd like to resolve Bug 62140 [0]. I just wanted to gather some opinions
about the implementation details. In my mind, the following solution is
quite reasonable:
1. Create new help scripts, such as help.sh and help.bat. These files
contain a method for each functional verb that
