subject:"DO NOT REPLY \[Bug 18500\] Host aliases to match by regular expression"

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18500] Host aliases to match by regular expression

2012-03-19 Thread bugzilla

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18500 Morten Haraldsen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mor...@ethlo.com -- Configure

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18500] Host aliases to match by regular expression

2011-09-27 Thread bugzilla

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18500 --- Comment #11 from Christopher Schultz 2011-09-27 18:06:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > I think it is just a single strategy: iterate linearly over list, trying each > candidate whether it matches or not. Oh, I meant "do we suppo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18500] Host aliases to match by regular expression

2011-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18500 --- Comment #10 from Konstantin Kolinko 2011-09-27 01:12:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > I just wouldn't watch to mix-and-match too many name-matching styles or things > are going to get seriously ridiculous (exact-match, then suffix

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18500] Host aliases to match by regular expression

2011-09-26 Thread bugzilla

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18500 --- Comment #9 from Christopher Schultz 2011-09-26 19:10:58 UTC --- Suffix-matching would certainly be faster than regular expression matching, but it has the same problems the regex's have with not being sortable, etc. Suffix-matching se

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18500] Host aliases to match by regular expression

2011-09-24 Thread bugzilla

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18500 --- Comment #8 from Konstantin Kolinko 2011-09-25 00:13:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > Konstantin, in that case we would just maintain a separate list of regex-based > matchers and they would all be consulted if no exact match was

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18500] Host aliases to match by regular expression

2011-09-22 Thread bugzilla

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18500 --- Comment #7 from Christopher Schultz 2011-09-22 16:01:00 UTC --- Konstantin, in that case we would just maintain a separate list of regex-based matchers and they would all be consulted if no exact match was found, right? Fall-back is t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18500] Host aliases to match by regular expression

2011-09-20 Thread bugzilla

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18500 --- Comment #6 from Konstantin Kolinko 2011-09-21 00:04:47 UTC --- Since last time when I participated in discussion of such a feature [1] my thought is - start processing in the Mapper with the currently implemented binary search - iff t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18500] Host aliases to match by regular expression

2011-09-20 Thread bugzilla

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18500 --- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz 2011-09-20 21:33:24 UTC --- Unfortunately for this enhancement, the Mapper is written to use a relatively high-performance binary search algorithm to find a matching given all the and definitions

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18500] Host aliases to match by regular expression

2011-08-10 Thread bugzilla

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18500 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Host aliases to match by|Host aliases to match by