https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #24 from Andrea F M 2010-09-17 00:37:16
EDT ---
how I can add the patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assigne
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
jfclere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Res
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #22 from Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-22 01:46:43
PST ---
With the latest changes, this now works :) Really tricky to get right ...
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
jfclere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #21 from Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-19 11:03:58
PST ---
I am testing on Linux.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #20 from Will Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-19 10:57:47 PST ---
Is this true on Linux, Remy? Or another OS. Solaris, for example, is known
to not tolerate sharing an ipv4+6 listener very well.
Essentially, any OS in wh
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #19 from Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-19 10:26:45
PST ---
Ok, so I was testing the old version :(
The new testing result is:
- no address attribute -> slow bind (20s at least), and does not bind the IPv6
- ad
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #18 from Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-08-19 06:56:16
PST ---
I (finally) tested it on my development machine which has both a NAT IPv4 and
an IPv6 address, and it does not appear to work any better.
No address a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #17 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-05 15:47:22 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=22217)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22217)
APR Java connector patch
This needs the native patch t
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #16 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-05 15:46:22 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=22216)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22216)
Native patch
*Health Warning*
I am no C programmer. T
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #15 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-05 15:40:46 PST
---
OK. There are two issues here.
The first is that the APR calls eventually called as a result of Address.info()
and Socket.create() in o.a.t.util.net.AprE
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #14 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-07-04 14:06:16 PST
---
Bingo! I can now reproduce this. Hopefully a fix won't be too far away...
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=em
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #13 from Siegmund Gorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-03 12:55:11 PST
---
Update on JSVC and APR
Involving debugging I found that my problem with JSVC and APR could be drilled
down to SSL library access I did not found the re
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #12 from David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-03 00:42:48 PST
---
I did a diff from what is in tomcat6-6.0.16/bin/tcnative.tar.gz and
tcnative-1.1.13 and the only differences were svn commit info in the comments,
so th
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-06-03 00:06:13 PST
---
David,
IPv6 is enabled. I was using tcnative 1.1.13. It might be worth testing with
that. Also, could you provide the contents of /etc/network/interfaces
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
Siegmund Gorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTE
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #9 from David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-29 22:59:53 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=22037)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22037)
logfile of build using the script
--
Configure bugm
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #8 from David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-29 22:58:04 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=22036)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22036)
script to demonstrate problem
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #6 from David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-29 22:12:40 PST
---
I can attempt to build using the tarballs from upstream. Do you have IPv6
enabled on your box, as that appears to be the problem? If you disable IPv6
the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEEDINFO
---
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #4 from David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-29 08:45:42 PST
---
Suitable snippet from the strace log:
9749 socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP) = 30
9749 setsockopt(30, SOL_SOCKET, SO_REUSEADDR, [1], 4) = 0
9
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
--- Comment #3 from David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-05-29 08:44:02 PST
---
That should be git://femme.catnip.org.uk/tomcat6.git
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
David Pashley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTE
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43327
Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
25 matches
Mail list logo