DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46339] Recursive tag files with JspFragment attributes fails

2009-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 Kin-Man Chung kin-man.ch...@sun.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46339] Recursive tag files with JspFragment attributes fails

2009-01-12 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #11 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2009-01-12 13:29:35 PST --- No problem. Patch reverted. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46339] Recursive tag files with JspFragment attributes fails

2009-01-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #9 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2009-01-09 09:14:18 PST --- Thanks for the patch. I have applied it to trunk and proposed it for 6.0.x. -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46339] Recursive tag files with JspFragment attributes fails

2009-01-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #7 from Jens Askengren jens.askeng...@gmail.com 2009-01-08 02:02:15 PST --- The patched tag file works in Tomcat but not on Resin. http://bugs.caucho.com/view.php?id=3228 To me, this code looks like it should evaluate

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46339] Recursive tag files with JspFragment attributes fails

2009-01-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #8 from Kin-Man Chung kin-man.ch...@sun.com 2009-01-08 16:44:06 PST --- Konstantin, Agreed with you on your reading of the spec on both points. However, I think the current tag file (without your patch) can be made to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46339] Recursive tag files with JspFragment attributes fails

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46339] Recursive tag files with JspFragment attributes fails

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #5 from Kin-Man Chung kin-man.ch...@sun.com 2009-01-07 18:15:14 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23094) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23094) Patch based on glassfish source The patch is based

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46339] Recursive tag files with JspFragment attributes fails

2009-01-07 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #6 from Konstantin Kolinko knst.koli...@gmail.com 2009-01-07 19:20:59 PST --- My reading of the spec (JSP 2.1, Final Release) is the following 1. The spec in many places uses calling page where calling page or tag is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46339] Recursive tag files with JspFragment attributes fails

2009-01-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 Kin-Man Chung kin-man.ch...@sun.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46339] Recursive tag files with JspFragment attributes fails

2008-12-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46339] Recursive tag files with JspFragment attributes fails

2008-12-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 --- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org 2008-12-28 15:16:20 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23055) -- (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23055) Patch used for testing I have attached the patch I used for