DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-02-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #1 from ashish.j...@in.ibm.com 2010-02-05 01:39:30 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=24930) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24930) Patch for spnego support in tomcat -- Configure bugmail: https://issu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 jfclere changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jfcl...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-02-10 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #2 from Mark Th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-02-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #3 from ashish.j...@in.ibm.com 2010-02-15 11:59:00 UTC --- My sincere apologies that patch did not make the standard of tomcat community. I have reformatted the patch and uploading a new one. To use this the only requirement is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-02-15 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #4 from ashish.j...@in.ibm.com 2010-02-15 12:01:18 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=24987) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24987) Updated patch for Spnego support in tomcat Kindly review and apply. -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-02-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 ashish.j...@in.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|6.0.20 |6.0.24 -- Configure bugma

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-03-08 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #5 from Mark

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-03-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 ashish.j...@in.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24930|0 |1 is obsolete|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-03-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #7 from ashish.j...@in.ibm.com 2010-03-22 09:40:40 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=25158) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25158) Jaas configuration file -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-03-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #8 from ashish.j...@in.ibm.com 2010-03-22 09:41:36 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=25159) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25159) Krb5 configuration file -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-03-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #9 from ashish.j...@in.ibm.com 2010-03-22 09:44:46 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=25160) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25160) Libraries for login module, realm implementation -- Configure bugmail

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-03-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #10 from ashish.j...@in.ibm.com 2010-03-22 09:45:49 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=25161) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25161) Sample test application -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-03-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #11 from ashish.j...@in.ibm.com 2010-03-22 09:48:03 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=25162) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25162) Java opts -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/u

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-03-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #12 from ashish.j...@in.ibm.com 2010-03-22 10:02:23 UTC --- Hi Mark, I have modified the patch as you have suggested in your latest update. The new modified patch includes the following: 1) No dependency on Basic, the applicati

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-04-06 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #13 from Mark Thomas 2010-04-06 14:15:58 UTC --- Adding all those JARs to a standard Tomcat installation isn't going to be acceptable. How feasible is a lighter weight implementation? A new authenticator and new realm is about t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-04-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #14 from ashish.j...@in.ibm.com 2010-04-22 03:38:51 EDT --- Regarding your question "Step 5 of Spnego", in most of the cases the size of the Spnego token will be less that < 4 KB however in case it goes over and above 4KB, maxHtt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-11-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 Michael Osipov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #15 from Michael

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-11-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #16 from Mark Thomas 2010-11-02 12:12:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > in my opinion all of these additional dependencies are superfluous. I wrote a > SpnegoAuthenticator for our webapps in less than 300 lines of code. All

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-11-21 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #17 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2010-11-21 15:58:39 EST --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > in my opinion all of these additional dependencies are superfluous. I wrote > > a > > SpnegoAuth

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2010-11-21 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> changed: What|Removed |Added CC||1983-01...@gmx

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #18 from Mark Thomas 2011-03-16 08:51:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > This is weird, I wasn't notified about your comment..Do you want me to attach > the maven project? What license do you prefer, ASL? Sorry for the slow

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #19 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-03-23 05:21:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=26792) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26792) Complete SPNEGO Authenticator and Active Directory Realm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-23 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #20 from Mark Thomas 2011-03-23 05:34:51 EDT --- I haven't look at this yet but I just wanted to say thank you and let you know this is on the radar. Personally, I'm snowed under with other stuff at the minute but I will get to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #21 from Mark Thomas 2011-03-25 13:59:58 EDT --- I'm looking at this now and currently trying to figure out the additional configuration required (JAAS, keytab, etc). Any notes you can provide that would save me from figuring st

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #22 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-03-25 15:07:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I'm looking at this now and currently trying to figure out the additional > configuration required (JAAS, keytab, etc). Any not

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-25 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #23 from Mark Thomas 2011-03-25 15:18:08 EDT --- Doh. I missed the javadoc completely. My bad. I'll take a look over the weekend and get back to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=e

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #24 from Mark Thomas 2011-03-26 13:24:23 EDT --- Having reviewed the Javadoc, there still appears to be a lot of information missing/assumed. The Geronimo notes from comment #12 appear to cover many of the missing steps. I plan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #25 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-03-26 13:48:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Having reviewed the Javadoc, there still appears to be a lot of information > missing/assumed. The Geronimo notes from comment

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #26 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-03-28 04:40:34 EDT --- Mark, here's what you need to make it run: I expect you/someone to have an already working AD environment where the server with tomcat running is registe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-28 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #27 from Mark Thomas 2011-03-28 08:01:05 EDT --- I'd managed to work out the system properties. I currently suspect issues with my jaas.conf and/or krb5.conf or possibly the keytab file. Samples of those would help although I am

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #28 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-03-30 04:12:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=26814) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26814) krb5.conf This is a sample Kerberos 5 conf file with mu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #29 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-03-30 04:14:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=26815) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26815) jaas.conf this jaas.conf contains two login modules. Th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #30 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-03-30 04:15:38 EDT --- Mark, I have attached some sample config files to make it run. This solution uses a keytab to validate tickets. I am aware of the Spring way, we use that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #31 from Mark Thomas 2011-03-30 07:01:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > I have attached some sample config files to make it run. This solution > uses a keytab to validate tickets. Thanks. It was the jaas.conf that I hadn't

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #32 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-03-30 14:08:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > I am aware of the Spring way, we use that Sec Extension also but I don't > > like that because of

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #33 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-03-30 14:11:08 EDT --- Sorry for the spelling, I was to hasty with the 'commit' button. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #34 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-03-30 14:19:55 EDT --- These docs are fine: http://wiki.alfresco.com/wiki/Configuring_the_CIFS_and_web_servers_for_Kerberos/AD_integration http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-30 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #35 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-03-30 14:29:33 EDT --- Sorry for spamming again. We run mixed environments with Windows Server 2003 and 2008, both serve as KDC. Server code works on Windows XP and HP-UX flawle

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-03-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 Mark Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #37 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-04-01 04:59:26 EDT --- Mark, I tried to build the current trunk to validate the code and mark some improvements but I fails with: build-docs: [xslt] Transforming into E:\Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #38 from Mark Thomas 2011-04-01 05:07:36 EDT --- Looks like you have a build environment problem. It builds fine for me and the multiple CI systems (buildbot and gump) that build this codebase. The users list is the best place t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #39 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-04-01 05:46:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Looks like you have a build environment problem. It builds fine for me and the > multiple CI systems (buildbot and gump) that b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #40 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-04-01 07:10:15 EDT --- Mark, there are some glitches which have to be addressed in my opinion: Constants.java: - DEFAULT_SPN_CLASS is never used, forgot to delete? - DEFAULT_KR

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #41 from Mark Thomas 2011-04-01 07:30:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) > - DEFAULT_SPN_CLASS is never used, forgot to delete? Fixed > - DEFAULT_KRB5_CONF value: .ini is Windows style, on Unix is krb5.conf only. I > would st

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #42 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-04-01 08:41:22 EDT --- Mark, I just compiled and deployed 7.0.12-dev to our test server. It works but fails at some point. The default server.xml is configured with:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #43 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-04-01 08:47:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > (In reply to comment #40) > > - DEFAULT_SPN_CLASS is never used, forgot to delete? > Fixed > > > - DEFAULT_KRB5_CONF value: .i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48685] Spnego Support in Tomcat

2011-04-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48685 --- Comment #44 from Michael Osipov <1983-01...@gmx.net> 2011-04-01 08:49:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > I disagree again because abstraction is not missing and not everyone uses an > Oracle JVM. Should read: I disagree again becau