Re: [jira] [Created] (MTOMCAT-271) My MyStuff

2014-06-13 Thread Mark Thomas
On 13/06/2014 17:51, Mark Barton (JIRA) wrote: Mark Barton created MTOMCAT-271: --- Summary: My MyStuff Key: MTOMCAT-271 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-271 Project: Apache Tomcat

Re: [jira] [Deleted] (MTOMCAT-251) User is not logged in as current user

2013-12-22 Thread Mark Thomas
On 22/12/2013 02:20, Olivier Lamy (*$^¨%`£) (JIRA) wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MTOMCAT-251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Olivier Lamy (*$^¨%`£) deleted MTOMCAT-251: --- User is not

Re: JIRA configuration for MTOMCAT - attachments not allowed?

2012-06-01 Thread Mark Thomas
On 01/06/2012 19:53, Konstantin Kolinko wrote: Hi! Looking at Tomcat Maven Plugin issues in JIRA, e.g. there is no way to submit an attachment. There is no Attach Files button. If I look at some Apache Commons issues, the Attach Files button is there. So that is some issue with

Re: [jira] [Created] (MTOMCAT-125) mvn tomcat7:run got javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name jdbc is not bound in this Context

2012-05-08 Thread Roberto Cisternino
It seems to me a problem related to a naming bug in JDK 1.7.x I had similar problems using Glassfish when I upgraded from 3.1.1 to 3.1.2 and on that time the JDK 1.7.x was recommended... I did it and my stable enterprise application stopped working. I would recommend to stay with JDK 1.6.x at

Re: [jira] [Created] (MTOMCAT-125) mvn tomcat7:run got javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name jdbc is not bound in this Context

2012-05-08 Thread Henri Gomez
Java 7 u4 is available for some time now. Did you try it ? Le 8 mai 2012 à 12:03, Roberto Cisternino roberto.cistern...@gmail.com a écrit : It seems to me a problem related to a naming bug in JDK 1.7.x I had similar problems using Glassfish when I upgraded from 3.1.1 to 3.1.2 and on that

Re: [jira] [Created] (MTOMCAT-125) mvn tomcat7:run got javax.naming.NameNotFoundException: Name jdbc is not bound in this Context

2012-05-08 Thread Roberto Cisternino
Unfortunately do not seems to contain any fix related to that issue. I hope to find the time to get my logs and extract full details to open an issue asap. Thanks On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Henri Gomez [via Tomcat] ml-node+s10n4960281...@n6.nabble.com wrote: Java 7 u4 is available for

Re: [jira] [Commented] (MTOMCAT-150) expose ports used with tomcat7:run as sys props

2012-05-04 Thread Guilherme Vanz

Re: [jira] [Commented] (MTOMCAT-142) contextFile path=... ignored when using tomcat7:run

2012-04-16 Thread Pid *
That's a new one. p On 16 Apr 2012, at 02:07, PC Treasures Support supp...@pctreasures.com wrote: Good Evening, I do apologize for the difficulty you are experiencing, I am going to forward this issue on to my Technician in the morning. Please send me your contact info so that I can get

Re: [jira] [Commented] (MTOMCAT-142) contextFile path=... ignored when using tomcat7:run

2012-04-15 Thread PC Treasures Support
Good Evening, I do apologize for the difficulty you are experiencing, I am going to forward this issue on to my Technician in the morning. Please send me your contact info so that I can get back with you on a resolution. On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Olivier Lamy (*$^¨%`£) (Commented) (JIRA)

Re: JIRA ?

2006-08-19 Thread Peter Rossbach
+1, and we can move the other parts later. Give new source a chance with a better bug system :-) Peter Am 18.08.2006 um 16:20 schrieb Remy Maucherat: Maybe JIRA should be used for TC 6 ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: JIRA ?

2006-08-19 Thread Mladen Turk
Peter Rossbach wrote: +1, and we can move the other parts later. Give new source a chance with a better bug system :-) I agree. The transition of other components if ever done would be a great thing to have, but its not mandatory for having TC6 in JIRA. If someone has a knowledge and itch

Re: JIRA ?

2006-08-19 Thread Mark Thomas
Remy Maucherat wrote: Mark Thomas wrote: +0. If we do move to Jira then we should move all TC projects to Jira. Why exactly ? Continuity. It is easier to have all bugs in a single system than to field the continual There wasn't a option for Tomcat X when creating a new bug so I filed it

Re: JIRA ?

2006-08-18 Thread Tim Funk
I'm indifferent. It looks like all projects are moving in the direction of using JIRA and most likely Bugzilla will stop being supported by infrastructure [like CVS was]. So its probably a good time to move. Is there talk of infrastructure stopping support of bugzilla anytime? -Tim Remy

Re: JIRA ?

2006-08-18 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
+1 Remy Maucherat wrote: Maybe JIRA should be used for TC 6 ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: JIRA ?

2006-08-18 Thread Mladen Turk
Remy Maucherat wrote: Maybe JIRA should be used for TC 6 ? ++1 Further more, I would like to have that all across tomcat.apache.org, not only for TC6. -- Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

RE: JIRA ?

2006-08-18 Thread Bill Barker
+0, but I agree with Mladen that we should migrate all TC version if we move to Jira. -Original Message- From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 7:20 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: JIRA ? Maybe JIRA should be used for TC 6 ? Rémy

Re: JIRA ?

2006-08-18 Thread Mark Thomas
+0. If we do move to Jira then we should move all TC projects to Jira. Mark Remy Maucherat wrote: Maybe JIRA should be used for TC 6 ? Rémy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: JIRA ?

2006-08-18 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mark Thomas wrote: +0. If we do move to Jira then we should move all TC projects to Jira. Why exactly ? TC 6 has (almost) no bugs filed, so the transition seems far easier. For the others, there's a transition cost. Rémy