On 28/08/2013 13:00, Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 14:14 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Jul 17 14:14:28 2013
>> New Revision: 1504148
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504148
>> Log:
>> Add the two new resolver types (stream and static) to Jasper in th
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 14:14 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Wed Jul 17 14:14:28 2013
> New Revision: 1504148
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504148
> Log:
> Add the two new resolver types (stream and static) to Jasper in the correct
> order and modify JasperELResolver so t
> From: Nick Williams [mailto:nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net]
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1504148
> I read "so the correct resolvers are skipped" as "so the resolvers
> that should be skipped are skipped."
That interpretation makes much more sense. I think the use of the word
"correct" twice i
On 17/07/2013 15:21, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: ma...@apache.org [mailto:ma...@apache.org] Subject: svn
>> commit: r1504148
>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504148 Log: Add the two new resolver
>> types (stream and static) to Jasper in the correct order and modify
>> JasperELResolver so
On Jul 17, 2013, at 9:21 AM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
>> From: ma...@apache.org [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
>> Subject: svn commit: r1504148
>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504148
>> Log:
>> Add the two new resolver types (stream and static) to Jasper in the correct
>> order and modify Jasp
> From: ma...@apache.org [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Subject: svn commit: r1504148
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504148
> Log:
> Add the two new resolver types (stream and static) to Jasper in the correct
> order and modify JasperELResolver so the correct resolvers are skipped.
Did you really