2015-03-06 16:49 GMT+01:00 Mark Thomas :
> I can see how both might be useful. No objections here.
>
> So in addition to my initial plan, I added some state information (NIO2
thinks it is a good idea to hide it), as well as flexibility for the
completion handler call (NIO2 calls it as soon as it r
On 06/03/2015 15:14, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi (Mark - nobody else will care I suppose),
>
> Since the SocketWrapperBase has been neatly factored away, I think scatter
> gather NIO2 style calls should be added to it for future use.
>
> - public void write(ByteBuffer[] src
Hi (Mark - nobody else will care I suppose),
Since the SocketWrapperBase has been neatly factored away, I think scatter
gather NIO2 style calls should be added to it for future use.
- public void write(ByteBuffer[] srcs, int offset, int length,
long timeout, TimeUnit unit, A
