Re: Tagging 5.5.20

2006-09-08 Thread Remy Maucherat
Yoav Shapira wrote: As long as someone (you probably, as the initiator ;)) is willing to maintain this notice, i.e. update it as necessary, I don't see this as too big a deal. It's very similar to the startup notice that says the APR library was not found on your path and you should consider usi

Re: Tagging 5.5.20

2006-09-08 Thread Yoav Shapira
As long as someone (you probably, as the initiator ;)) is willing to maintain this notice, i.e. update it as necessary, I don't see this as too big a deal. It's very similar to the startup notice that says the APR library was not found on your path and you should consider using it for optimal per

Re: Tagging 5.5.20

2006-09-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Don't see what's the problem with something like that. Regards, Mladen. I'm against such change to, not because of usefulness or not, we're trying to cut a stable release, if you want to do it, do for the next tomcat release. Then use 1.1.4 if you wish a stabl

Re: Tagging 5.5.20

2006-09-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Mladen Turk wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: I still don't see much usefulness. 1.1.4 doesn't contain any serious fixes over 1.1.3, but causes a warning. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/network.c?r1=412388&r2=415547&diff_format=h It doesn't set/restore the

Re: Tagging 5.5.20

2006-09-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Remy Maucherat wrote: I still don't see much usefulness. 1.1.4 doesn't contain any serious fixes over 1.1.3, but causes a warning. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/native/src/network.c?r1=412388&r2=415547&diff_format=h It doesn't set/restore the timeout for each socke

Re: Tagging 5.5.20

2006-09-08 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: Remy Maucherat wrote: OK. I'll try to refactor the APR listener so it uses the 'minimum API' (1.1.3) version without breaking, and issuing a note if the version is less then 'recommended' (1.1.4). This is useless (and possibly even dangerous) because the "recommended" vers

Re: Tagging 5.5.20

2006-09-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Remy Maucherat wrote: OK. I'll try to refactor the APR listener so it uses the 'minimum API' (1.1.3) version without breaking, and issuing a note if the version is less then 'recommended' (1.1.4). This is useless (and possibly even dangerous) because the "recommended" version may change in th

Re: Tagging 5.5.20

2006-09-08 Thread Remy Maucherat
Mladen Turk wrote: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Ok, with the latest mishap of the native versions, we'll make another attempt. I will tag 5.5.20 on Monday, 4pm CST (22.00 GMT) OK. I'll try to refactor the APR listener so it uses the 'minimum API' (1.1.3) version without breaking, and issui

Re: Tagging 5.5.20

2006-09-08 Thread Mladen Turk
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote: Ok, with the latest mishap of the native versions, we'll make another attempt. I will tag 5.5.20 on Monday, 4pm CST (22.00 GMT) OK. I'll try to refactor the APR listener so it uses the 'minimum API' (1.1.3) version without breaking, and issuing a note if the ver

Tagging 5.5.20

2006-09-08 Thread Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
Ok, with the latest mishap of the native versions, we'll make another attempt. I will tag 5.5.20 on Monday, 4pm CST (22.00 GMT) Filip - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED