Thanks for the update. Good work!
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 07:07 Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that the final versions of the TCKs for Jakarta 9 are available I've
> been running them against the current 10.0.x (effectively 10.0.0-M10).
>
> The results can be summarised as:
>
> Expression
On 23/11/2020 19:57, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:07 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> Given the alpha/beta/stable definition from [1], 10.0.x now clearly
>> meets the criteria for beta and some may consider it meets the criteria
>> for stable. With that in mind the next 10.0.x
On 23/11/2020 19:29, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2020, 17:07 Mark Thomas wrote:
>> It is worth noting the Jakarta EE 9 only targetted Java 8. Current
>> planning is that a Jakarta EE 9.1 release will target Java 11 support
>> (while retaining Java 8 compatibility). This is
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:07 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> Given the alpha/beta/stable definition from [1], 10.0.x now clearly
> meets the criteria for beta and some may consider it meets the criteria
> for stable. With that in mind the next 10.0.x release vote will include
> options for broken, beta
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020, 17:07 Mark Thomas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that the final versions of the TCKs for Jakarta 9 are available I've
> been running them against the current 10.0.x (effectively 10.0.0-M10).
>
> The results can be summarised as:
>
> Expression Language
>- Passes apart from
Hi all,
Now that the final versions of the TCKs for Jakarta 9 are available I've
been running them against the current 10.0.x (effectively 10.0.0-M10).
The results can be summarised as:
Expression Language
- Passes apart from the API signature test because we use BND
annotations for
