; To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Unit tests and trunk
>
> On 12/07/2012 02:05, Filip Hanik wrote:
> > I can reproduce the bug in both our unit tests and the original bug
> report. further more I can turn non blocking into blocking by opening an
> clos
On 12/07/2012 02:05, Filip Hanik wrote:
> I can reproduce the bug in both our unit tests and the original bug report.
> further more I can turn non blocking into blocking by opening an closing a
> selector that is never used.
>
> definitely a bug, since a jvm/network flag resolves it.
>
> whi
I can reproduce the bug in both our unit tests and the original bug report.
further more I can turn non blocking into blocking by opening an closing a
selector that is never used.
definitely a bug, since a jvm/network flag resolves it.
while your vm may support ipv6, there is still an additio
On 11/07/2012 23:30, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> I wasn't able to reproduce on a Win 7 VM because the VM environment itself
> doesn't support IPv6
Given who we work for, the opportunities for humorous comments is
extensive :)
I'll settle for saying that I've double checked the VM I have
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 4:30 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Unit tests and trunk
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 4:28 PM
> > To: To
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 4:28 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Unit tests and trunk
>
> On 11/07/2012 22:39, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> > Ok, I have a reso
stalled at the network stack
>>
>> Filip
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:32 PM
>>> To: Tomcat Developers List
>>> Subject: Re: Unit tests and trunk
>
bit-server-hangs-on-socket.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 2:54 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Unit tests and trunk
>
> The idea of creating a VM th
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 1:32 PM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Unit tests and trunk
>
> On 11/07/2012 20:13, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@h
On 11/07/2012 20:13, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:13 AM
>> To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
>> Subject: RE: U
> -Original Message-
> From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 10:13 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Unit tests and trunk
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2012 2:45 AM
> To: Tomcat Developers List
> Subject: Re: Unit tests and trunk
>
> On 11/07/2012 02:27, Filip Hanik (mailing lists) wrote:
> > Here's what I
p; buf.hasRemaining()) {
> if (keycount > 0) { //only write if we were registered for
> a write
> int cnt = socket.write(buf); //write the data
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com]
data
> -Original Message-
> From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 10:43 AM
> To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Unit tests and trunk
>
> Ok, definitely a bug in Java 7/Windows 7.
> If I turn on
Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 2:31 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
> Subject: RE: Unit tests and trunk
>
> This failure happens when the write blocks, and we enter the Selector
> for a
> write operation.
&g
This failure happens when the write blocks, and we enter the Selector for a
write operation.
filip
> -Original Message-
> From: Filip Hanik (mailing lists) [mailto:devli...@hanik.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 2:23 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
> Subject:
s List
> Subject: Unit tests and trunk
>
> With the fixes over the weekend for setting traffic class, I now see the
> unit tests passing consistently for:
>
> Windows: BIO, NIO, APR
> Linux: BIO, NIO
>
> I do see a consistent failure for Linux and APR with the Comet tests.
With the fixes over the weekend for setting traffic class, I now see the
unit tests passing consistently for:
Windows: BIO, NIO, APR
Linux: BIO, NIO
I do see a consistent failure for Linux and APR with the Comet tests. It
is the connector stop test failing (the one that was failing in buildbot
pr
18 matches
Mail list logo
