On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:06 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010
New Revision: 1036150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150view=rev
Log:
Add recent performance improvements to changelog
Ok.
So we have two queues that can essentially grow up
On 11/18/2010 01:45 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:06 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010
New Revision: 1036150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150view=rev
Log:
Add recent performance improvements to changelog
Ok.
On 18/11/2010 12:45, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:06 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010
New Revision: 1036150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150view=rev
Log:
Add recent performance improvements to changelog
Ok.
So
On 18/11/2010 13:01, jean-frederic clere wrote:
On 11/18/2010 01:45 PM, Remy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-17 at 18:06 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010
New Revision: 1036150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150view=rev
Log:
Add recent
If the Random number generator is sufficiently random could we avoid
the digesting? Or should it be an option?
Since java1.6 has SecureRandom - is its current implementation good
enough to avoid all the extra tricks currently being done and we can
just use that as a default? [Or maybe - we
Author: markt
Date: Wed Nov 17 18:06:20 2010
New Revision: 1036150
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1036150view=rev
Log:
Add recent performance improvements to changelog
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
