HI Filip,
I see the problem also and I like your proposed solution.
+1
peter
Am 27.04.2007 um 17:18 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists:
here is a patch that would solve it the way I proposed
Index: java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/transport/nio/
ParallelNioSender.java
here is a patch that would solve it the way I proposed
Index: java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/transport/nio/ParallelNioSender.java
===
---
java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/transport/nio/ParallelNioSender.java
(revision 533123
Been thinking some more about this, this solution is definitely not right.
Two reasons:
1. A member can opt out of the membership without wanting to disconnect
the TCP sockets
2. There is no clean way to kill "active" connections
Instead the better solution would be this:
1. Issue keepalive as
Peter Rossbach wrote:
HI Filip,
this is the next step at weekend :-)
how about you discuss what the proposed changes are before you commit
them, I am still not sure this is the right way to go as keep alive will
take care of any connections left hanging, and also removing "active"
connections
HI Filip,
this is the next step at weekend :-)
Peter
Am 27.04.2007 um 05:14 schrieb Filip Hanik - Dev Lists:
I would say this is a -1
this only removes the connections from the idle while it leaves the
other ones hanging, hence leaves an inconsistent state.
if we are gonna implement this
I would say this is a -1
this only removes the connections from the idle while it leaves the
other ones hanging, hence leaves an inconsistent state.
if we are gonna implement this solution, lets do it correct or not at all.
Filip
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pero
Date: Thu Apr 26 14:41:4
Author: pero
Date: Thu Apr 26 14:41:47 2007
New Revision: 532877
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=532877
Log:
Remove senders as member disappeared..
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/tribes/transport/PooledSender.java
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apa
