Rainer Jung wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Does that make sense for you?
Yes it does. The most important is that if
there was no retries set for ajp worker, it gets copied
from lb worker.
In fact we don't copy (this is not new), because the retries for an lb
has a
Hi Mladen, I found it :)
Mladen Turk schrieb:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Does that make sense for you?
Yes it does. The most important is that if
there was no retries set for ajp worker, it gets copied
from lb worker.
In fact we don't copy (this is not
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen, I found it :)
It was like that in 1.2.15. Then in July 2006, shortly before 1.2.18 you
changed that:
I knew it ;)
I even know why I changed that, but that's another story.
Nevertheless, sorry for the noise.
Regards,
Mladen
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jan 7 11:41:44 2008
New Revision: 609757
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609757view=rev
Log:
Remove retries element from service struct, because
we don't use it.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/native/apache-1.3/mod_jk.c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jan 7 11:41:44 2008
New Revision: 609757
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609757view=rev
Log:
Remove retries element from service struct, because
we don't use it.
I don't get it.
This copy was intentionally made so we can pass the
Mladen Turk schrieb:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Mon Jan 7 11:41:44 2008
New Revision: 609757
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=609757view=rev
Log:
Remove retries element from service struct, because
we don't use it.
I don't get it.
This copy was intentionally made so
Rainer Jung wrote:
Does that make sense for you?
Yes it does. The most important is that if
there was no retries set for ajp worker, it gets copied
from lb worker.
Regards,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
Does that make sense for you?
Yes it does. The most important is that if
there was no retries set for ajp worker, it gets copied
from lb worker.
In fact we don't copy (this is not new), because the retries for an lb
has a different functional meaning