On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 14:37 +0100, Mark Thomas wrote:
> This broke with
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=703017
> for org.apache.coyote.ajp.AjpProtocol but I suspect no-one ever tested
> it until today when I swapped AJP implementations for trunk.
>
> I'm open to fixing it a differ
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 10:20 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Apr 9 10:20:36 2009
>> New Revision: 763585
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763585&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Java uses 0 rather than -1 for infinite socket timeout
>
> But the va
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 10:20 +, ma...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Thu Apr 9 10:20:36 2009
> New Revision: 763585
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763585&view=rev
> Log:
> Java uses 0 rather than -1 for infinite socket timeout
But the value is never used if <= 0, so what
Author: markt
Date: Thu Apr 9 10:20:36 2009
New Revision: 763585
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=763585&view=rev
Log:
Java uses 0 rather than -1 for infinite socket timeout
Modified:
tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/JIoEndpoint.java
Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/t
