Buildbot success in on tomcat-10.1.x

2022-12-16 Thread buildbot
Build status: Build succeeded! Worker used: bb2_worker2_ubuntu URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/44/builds/606 Blamelist: Mark Thomas Build Text: build successful Status Detected: restored build Build Source Stamp: [branch 10.1.x] 9ff44bd2b75a99865fe4886c094ab120b748beb2 Steps:

[tomcat] branch 8.5.x updated: Fix dropped HTTP/2 responses.

2022-12-16 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 8.5.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/8.5.x by this push: new f9f37b251a Fix dropped HTTP/2 responses.

[tomcat] branch 9.0.x updated: Fix dropped HTTP/2 responses.

2022-12-16 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push: new 448d02cdb2 Fix dropped HTTP/2 responses.

[tomcat] branch 10.1.x updated: Fix dropped HTTP/2 responses.

2022-12-16 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push: new 9ff44bd2b7 Fix dropped HTTP/2 responses.

[tomcat] branch main updated: Fix dropped HTTP/2 responses.

2022-12-16 Thread markt
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. markt pushed a commit to branch main in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push: new 1e7e121cef Fix dropped HTTP/2 responses. 1e7e121cef

Re: HTTP/2 priorities

2022-12-16 Thread Rémy Maucherat
On Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 5:21 PM Mark Thomas wrote: > > Hi all, > > I plan to implement RFC 9218 [1] for HTTP/2 in Tomcat 11. Depending on > how that goes, I may back-port the changes. > > Given the difficulties we have in prioritizing creation of responses, I > plan to continue the current

[Bug 66392] AccessLogValue's file encoding does not correspond to the documentation

2022-12-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66392 --- Comment #2 from Michael Osipov --- (In reply to Han Li from comment #1) > (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #0) > > May java.nio.charset.Charset.defaultCharset() would be better here, no? > No, I found the reason why not use