https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
--- Comment #5 from Chris ---
You are absolutely right. Setting a SystemProperty within a web application is
not a desired approach.
The circumstances of our web application are rather homogeneous: it is always
installed as the one and only
чт, 18 апр. 2024 г. в 00:46, Rainer Jung :
>
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> Am 17.04.24 um 21:44 schrieb Konstantin Kolinko:
> > ср, 17 апр. 2024 г. в 17:21, Rainer Jung :
> >>
> >> Am 17.04.24 um 15:34 schrieb Michael Osipov:
> >>> Rainer, I do not fully understand the problem here. We use libtool to
>
Hi Konstantin,
Am 17.04.24 um 21:44 schrieb Konstantin Kolinko:
ср, 17 апр. 2024 г. в 17:21, Rainer Jung :
Am 17.04.24 um 15:34 schrieb Michael Osipov:
Rainer, I do not fully understand the problem here. We use libtool to solve
exactly this problem with versioned SONAMEs. It will create
Am 17.04.24 um 22:46 schrieb Michael Osipov:
On 2024/04/17 14:21:06 Rainer Jung wrote:
Am 17.04.24 um 15:34 schrieb Michael Osipov:
Rainer, I do not fully understand the problem here. We use libtool to solve
exactly this problem with versioned SONAMEs. It will create symlinks to the
SONAME.
On 2024/04/17 14:21:06 Rainer Jung wrote:
> Am 17.04.24 um 15:34 schrieb Michael Osipov:
> > Rainer, I do not fully understand the problem here. We use libtool to solve
> > exactly this problem with versioned SONAMEs. It will create symlinks to the
> > SONAME.
> > Do you expect anyone even with
ср, 17 апр. 2024 г. в 17:21, Rainer Jung :
>
> Am 17.04.24 um 15:34 schrieb Michael Osipov:
> > Rainer, I do not fully understand the problem here. We use libtool to solve
> > exactly this problem with versioned SONAMEs. It will create symlinks to the
> > SONAME.
> > Do you expect anyone even
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68911
--- Comment #2 from Remy Maucherat ---
I will review next week. It is very convoluted so it's possible something is
missing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
jose-galvez commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2061838297
> Why not use `%D` which is in milliseconds (Tomcat <10) or microseconds
(Tomcat >= 10)?
I wanted to keep parity on the behavior here with previous versions,
especially because
jose-galvez commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2061821679
> From memory that change was to align Tomcat's access log configuration
with httpd. It may well be that the correct fix here is to correct the
documentation. Separately, comparing this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68911
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
Status|NEW
ChristopherSchultz commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2061771435
Why not use `%D` which is in milliseconds (Tomcat <10) or microseconds
(Tomcat >= 10)?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68911
Bug ID: 68911
Summary: Newly introduced ConfigurationSource doesn't respect
environment variables
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.x
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to Chris from comment #2)
>
> System.setProperty(javax.xml.stream.XMLInputFactory.class.getName(),
> WstxInputFactory.class.getName());
>
The above line of code affects the whole JVM, not
markt-asf commented on PR #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720#issuecomment-2061540617
From memory that change was to align Tomcat's access log configuration with
httpd. It may well be that the correct fix here is to correct the documentation.
Separately, comparing this
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68910
--- Comment #2 from Michael Osipov ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #1)
> (In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #0)
> > since we also do support LibreSSL [...]
>
> Note: Support for LibreSSL is more of an aspiration and
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Schultz ---
:(
Sorry about that. We'll re-evaluate our solution to the opposite problem, which
is ClassLoader-pinning when the webapp's ClassLoader is used to obtain the
XMLInputFactory.
--
You are receiving
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68910
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Michael Osipov from comment #0)
> since we also do support LibreSSL [...]
Note: Support for LibreSSL is more of an aspiration and less of a requirement.
We don't technically advertise
jose-galvez opened a new pull request, #720:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat/pull/720
commit
[a8575ef](https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/a8575efbc1de64fe58c8fd99e53a0011b59a8e86)
removed support for seconds with floating point for the Extended Access Log
Valve and made it only
Am 17.04.24 um 15:34 schrieb Michael Osipov:
Rainer, I do not fully understand the problem here. We use libtool to solve
exactly this problem with versioned SONAMEs. It will create symlinks to the
SONAME.
Do you expect anyone even with dlopen() to load libfoo.o.{SOVERSION} unless it
is
Rainer, I do not fully understand the problem here. We use libtool to solve
exactly this problem with versioned SONAMEs. It will create symlinks to the
SONAME.
Do you expect anyone even with dlopen() to load libfoo.o.{SOVERSION} unless it
is strictly needed?
E.g.:
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68876
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
I've converted the original mdl file to six SCG files and added those to the
main branch. I've also fixed the "warpper" typo.
They still need quite a bit of clean up including:
- cleaning up the layout so
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
commit 15d192a944580be723fa1df53e7e7d9cb68f762d
Author: Mark Thomas
AuthorDate: Wed Apr 17 12:56:17 2024 +0100
Fix typo
---
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
from 79009baf0a Align NioChannel and SecureNioChannel
new f6d0e9cfa8 Convert original Rational Rose mdl file to svgs
ilapavuluri opened a new issue, #55:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomcat-jakartaee-migration/issues/55
I am using tomcat transformer for javax to jakarta conversion, in the
similar lines I converted my activemq-all 5.16.7 into jakarta using the same
tomcat transformer, no errors during
Hi there,
I did some small tests using OpenSSL/Panama with TC 10.1.23 for running
the unit tests.
First: they seem to work well using JDK 22 with OpenSSL 3.0.13, 3.1.5,
3.2.1 and 3.3.0. For JDK 23 the tests are still running, but also look
good up to now.
But some things around native
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68876
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Mark
Build status: Build succeeded!
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/44/builds/1222
Blamelist: Mark Thomas
Build Text: build successful
Status Detected: restored build
Build Source Stamp: [branch 10.1.x] 474701d1c4872bcd9e530444d61677863d8bc09d
Steps:
Build status: Build succeeded!
Worker used: bb_worker2_ubuntu
URL: https://ci2.apache.org/#builders/112/builds/1038
Blamelist: Mark Thomas
Build Text: build successful
Status Detected: restored build
Build Source Stamp: [branch main] 79009baf0af9e0f2b02753a352e31e5bb3f85396
Steps:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68910
Michael Osipov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||micha...@apache.org
--
You are
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68910
Bug ID: 68910
Summary: Improve LibreSSL version check in tcnative.m4
Product: Tomcat Native
Version: 2.0.7
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity:
On 16/04/2024 14:11, Christopher Schultz wrote:
The proposed 10.1.23 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 10.1.23
Unit tests pass on Linux, Windows and MacOS (M1).
Build is reproducible.
Mark
PS I am still unable to test on MacOS (Intel) as it is a
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 79009baf0a Align NioChannel and SecureNioChannel
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 9.0.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/9.0.x by this push:
new 72823b4ea0 Align NioChannel and SecureNioChannel
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
markt pushed a commit to branch 10.1.x
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/10.1.x by this push:
new 474701d1c4 Align NioChannel and SecureNioChannel
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68908
--- Comment #2 from Mark Thomas ---
*** Bug 68878 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68878
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||huangzeling8...@dingtalk.co
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68908
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
OS|
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
--- Comment #2 from Chris ---
Yeah, it comes down to these changes:
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/a2167e13c19115aecd220cd3be19d43d36126f3b
https://github.com/apache/tomcat/commit/3b8f277a7ffc1193ed6c6d4fff85db6dc7327e39
We set a
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
Chris changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS||All
--- Comment #1 from Chris ---
I located
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68909
Bug ID: 68909
Summary: JSP compilation error due to classpath problems
Product: Tomcat 9
Version: 9.0.88
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority:
41 matches
Mail list logo
