Guenter Knauf wrote:
> Hi all,
> since I often test with different Tomcat versions I would find it useful to
> see the TC version too with the snoop sample, f.e. something like that (or
> also at the end added):
-1. This will create a minor information disclosure vulnerability.
The same (actual
David Rees wrote:
> BTW, didn't that page used to list security issues for older versions
> of mod_jk as well? I seem to remember more information being on that
> page not too long ago.
Nope. It is a new page.
It is still a work in progress so there may well be additions as I dig
through the arch
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Fix some logging related memory leaks. This fixes 41272 and the root
> -1. Getting a logger has, AFAIK, a possibly significant cost. Since
> getting a RD is a very common option, this is not acceptable.
I took a look at the commons-logging code. T
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> public abstract class ManagerBase implements Manager,
>> MBeanRegistration {
>> -protected Log log = LogFactory.getLog(ManagerBase.class);
>> +protected Log log = null;
>
> I'm also fairly certain this causes NPEs, so this part of the ch
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Yoav Shapira wrote:
>>> Yoav is the current RM for this branch. If he has no time to continue
>>> doing it, I think we would need a new RM for Tomcat 5.0.x.
>>
>> I guess I am ;)
>>
>> I would prefer if someone else could take over the RM duties for
>> 5.0.x. I unfortunatel
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> I'll do it if no-one else steps forward.
>
> A vote is needed to elect a new RM, so if you're candidate for the job,
> you can post the vote.
I'll give it to the weekend for other volunteers to step forward. I'll
Bhat, Deepak (STSD) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am facing a problem with my application trying to retrieve
> data through the tomcat server.
This question belongs on the users list. Tomcat does cache static
resources and this is configured at the context level. See cacheTTL and
cachingAllowed on
Joe Hertz wrote:
> Because like I said before, as long as these deprecated methods are being
> used, Tomcat's javax.servlet.* implementation's days are numbers. The next
> JDK won't have these methods. Then it's game over. No compilation under the
> next JDK. If the spec hasn't changed, nor your
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: costin
> Date: Thu May 18 17:58:16 2006
> New Revision: 407674
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=407674&view=rev
> Log:
> Cleaning up the sandbox
>
> Removed:
> tomcat/connectors/trunk/coyote/src/java/org/apache/coyote/tomcat3/
> tomcat/connector
w how to rollback on svn ??
>
> Costin
>
> On 5/18/06, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> > Author: costin
>> > Date: Thu May 18 17:58:16 2006
>> > New Revision: 407674
>> >
>> > URL: http:/
Mark Thomas wrote:
> You do an svn copy and specify the version number. Not sure of the exact
> syntax. I use Tortoise SVN and do a "revert this version" from the log view.
>
> I'll do this now.
Hmmm. Not working. Back to the command line...
Once i have worked out wh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: costin
> Date: Thu May 18 18:25:12 2006
> New Revision: 407678
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=407678&view=rev
> Log:
> Rolling back
Thanks.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR
David Gagnon wrote:
> Hope that oki. I look the 5.5.17 code and the problem is still there.
> Is that the right way to submit a Patch. If I need to open a bug
> directly, let me know
It is usually best to open a bug report and attach your patch. This
way, it is less likely to get overlooked if s
All,
Having just closed the last open bug for 4.1.x (only enhancement
requests left) now seems like a good time for a 4.1.32 release.
I am volunteering to be the release manager and given the discussions
on voting at the time of the last 5.5.x release, I am proposing the
following:
- vote to rele
It is implied, given I started the thread but to make it clear...
> [X] +1 I am in favour of a 4.1.32-beta release
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Terry Zhou wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
> When I changed engine name to another (not default "Catalina") in
> server.xml,
> for example "testEngine", I found there were two domain names in MBean tree
> of tomcat, one was "Catalina", and the other was "testEngine", I
> wondered if
> there was some other w
Please do not cross-post between the users and the dev list.
This question belongs on the users list.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adrian M wrote:
> However, I'm having some problems understanding the structure of the
> whole project because the apparent inconsistency between the
> documentation (Tomcat API for v. 5.5) and the source code in the (5) Tomcat
> projects. For instance, I cannot locate the org.apache.jk.* packa
Tom Miller wrote:
> If none of you volunteer I will have to post my need on the
> list and keep bother you all until I get some solution (-:
> (-:
Or until I or one of the other list owners get fed up with your spam
and unsubscribe you. "I'll keep hassling you until you help me" isn't
what open
This question belongs on the users list. Please see
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html for more info.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That's 2 +1's and a +0. Any committer care to chip in with another +1
so I can go ahead with the beta release?
Cheers,
Mark
Peter Rossbach wrote:
> [x ] +1 I am in favour of a 4.1.32-beta release
>
> Great job :-)
>
> peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> I'm looking for UML diagrams and sequence diagrams.
Sorry, they don't exist.
>>> About mod_jk.c, my file is quit huge (2757 lines wc -l mod_jk.c) and
>>> there is not a lot of comments so I've some issues to understand it,
>>> is there others docs?
Again. Sorry, but
Mark Thomas wrote:
+1's
Mark Thomas
Peter Rossbach
Bill Barker
Filip Hanik
Remy Maucherat
Rainer Jung
+0's
Yoav Shapira
The release of 4.1.32 beta is therefore approved by the Tomcat PMC.
I'll cut it this weekend with the announcement going out once it is on
the mirrors.
Bill,
Thanks for clarifying things. I read through
http://www.apache.org/dev/#releases but didn't find anything as
definitive and clear as your summary. I'll happily follow the process
you outlined for 4.1.32
To clarify the position on the beta status, the Tomcat project has
historically (at leas
All,
Following Bill's advice I am re-running this vote based on a tarball.
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/
MD5s:
apache-tomcat-4.1.32-src.tar.gz 6d02184d961954a6670db2d0c1e9c39e
apache-tomcat-4.1.32-src.zip 467ea0d5ee
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta.
To kick things off, here is my +1
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
> I am not a tomcat expert. I got the apache-tomcat-4.1.32-src.tar.gz from
> the link u have given. It seems to be build.xml and build.properties files
> are missing in the root folder
The Tomcat 4 build structure is slightly different to TC5. The main
build.xml is in
Jean-frederic Clere wrote:
> Build 4.1.31 was really more easy.
My intention was for the src download to mirror the SVN structure so
building from a checkout of
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/current/tc4.1.x and building
from the src are exactly the same process. It is a change but it
shou
Amila Suriarachchi wrote:
> What is the reason for this move? In tomcat 5.0 and tomact5.5 (even in
> 4.1.31 as i remember) build is created very smoothly when I run ant from
> the
> root folder.
So building from an svn checkout and building from a src tarball use
exactly the same process.
The bui
This question belongs on the users list. See
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html for more information.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jitendra Kharche wrote:
> Hi there, can anybody help me on this. I have posted this problem in
> user mailing list 3-4 times in last two weeks but I havn't got any reply
> that can solve my problem. Please help me.
This message does not belong on the dev list. Please keep this thread
on the users
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.32 as beta.
>
> Download from:
> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> MD5s:
> apache-tomcat-4.1.32-src.tar.gz 6d02184d961954a6670db2d0c1e9c39e
> apache-tomcat-4.1.32-src.zip 467ea0d5eea9501c2b2
Joachim Fuchs wrote:
> My question is, what is this call good for? It results in an NPE, which is
> caught a few lines later.
> Or did I miss anything? Are there any side effects that are not obvious?
It prevents a memory leak. See
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=109449671603358&w=2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Add 4.1.32 beta
I haven't forgotten the announcement e-mail. When I first tried to
upload the 4.1.32 files we had a power cut for about 8 hours just as
the upload was getting started. I fixed things this morning once we
had power back but the mirrors haven't sorted thems
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Apache Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability
of Tomcat v4.1.32-beta. This release contains dozens of bug fixes and
a number of other updates. Please consult the release notes included
in the distributions for more details.
Do
Surya Bob wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am trying to tighten up our Apache and Tomcat implementation. I want
> to suppress server type and version to make fingerprinting harder.
This question belongs on the users list. Please repost it there.
Mark
---
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Mladen Turk wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is the config that IMHO each committer using
>> TortoiseSVN should set up.
There is already an Apache wide recommendation that would appear to be
more comprehensive.
http://www.apache.org/dev/svn-eol-style.txt
Mark
-
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Here is the config that IMHO each committer using
>>>> TortoiseSVN should set up.
>>
>> There is already an Apache wide recommendation that would appear to be
>> more comprehensive.
>&g
Nikita Belov wrote:
> Why are you ignoring me? Am I state my question so incomprehensible or
> is my English so bad?
http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/tomcatuser.html#why
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional co
Lichtenfeld, Enno, ext. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we need a Jakarta connector for Win2K3 Server (x64) with IIS 6.0.
This question belongs on the users list since it is about how to use
Tomcat.
The dev list is for questions related to the development (ie changes
in source code) of Tomcat.
Mark
-
Gregor Schneider wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> ok, one problems is solved so far, after I plugged my eyes back in I saw
> how
> to get hold of the Container (sometimes it's useful to read the Tomcat-Docs
> rather than the Sun-Docs...
This question belongs on the users list. Please redirect your enquiry
t
jeusdi wrote:
> Hello, I've configured Apache Web Server with mod_jk2 to communicate it with
> Apache Tomcat 5.5. Mmm, I've created a Web Application with one JSP
> (index.JSP) and one Servlet (it is performed form JSP).
>
> All is ok, but when I access to my web Application the result is the code
Gregor Schneider wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> I know that this usually belongs to the userlist, however, after a few days
> zero answers - it seems as nobody there has the knoehow to answer those
> questions :(
http://tomcat.apache.org/faq/tomcatuser.html#why
--
prakash shanmugam wrote:
> hai all,
>
> i have one major issue in my project..
This question belongs on the users list.
users is for questions about developing applications that are hosted
on Tomcat.
dev is for developing Tomcat.
Mark
-
Vinaya Tirikkovalluru wrote:
> Any help on this is greatly appreciated.
This question belongs on the users list. Please redirect your question
there.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-ma
+0. If we do move to Jira then we should move all TC projects to Jira.
Mark
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Maybe JIRA should be used for TC 6 ?
>
> Rémy
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-ma
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> +0. If we do move to Jira then we should move all TC projects to Jira.
>
> Why exactly ?
Continuity. It is easier to have all bugs in a single system than to
field the continual "There wasn't a option for Tomcat X when crea
All,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.33 as beta.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/
MD5s:
apache-tomcat-4.1.33-src.tar.gz c4fbeda65a3d7418b129d5ec69fa18de
The vote will run for approximately 72 hours.
If this VOTE passes, a stability vote will be held a suitable peri
Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.33 as beta.
+1, in case it wasn't obvious ;)
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Hi,
> +1 for the release.
>
> I've added versions 4.1.33, 5.5.18, and 6.0.0 to Bugzilla so that we
> have one less thing to do when we cut those releases...
Thanks.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
All,
This vote passed (thanks to those that voted) but with the help of
Simon Kitching on the commons-dev list bug 40252 has been fully
resolved. Therefore I do not intend to go further with this release
but to go to 4.1.34. This also allows the RELEASE-NOTES changes raised
earlier today to be in
Haven't been able to determine why, but the win32 binary for JK 1.2.18
doesn't work with IIS5. JK 1.2.15 works without a hitch.
There have been a number of similar reports on the users list.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is one serious bug in 1.2.18 that makes
> it unusable for IIS if there is a missing optional
> directive (rewrite_rule_file).
Thanks for your message on the users list about this.
> Since we had already lots of commits fixing various
> problems, 1.2.19 is somet
All,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 as beta.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/
MD5s:
apache-tomcat-4.1.34-src.tar.gz 3c6aaa47279a33d8e256af620ddaac9b
The vote will run for approximately 72 hours.
If this VOTE passes, a stability vote will be held a suitable peri
For the record, +1
Mark
Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 as beta.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: mturk
> Date: Thu Aug 31 05:46:58 2006
> New Revision: 438898
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=438898&view=rev
> Log:
> I'm not an native English speaker, but the
> 'Changes with' compared with 'Changes in' or
> 'Changes from' sound more reasonable to me
Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 as beta.
+1 Mark Thomas
+1 Remy Maucherat
+1 Yoav Shapira
+1 Jim Jagielski
With 4 +1s this vote has passed. I am aiming to do the actual release
sometime over the coming weekend. The usual announcements will fo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: remm
> Date: Fri Sep 1 06:54:50 2006
> New Revision: 439322
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=439322&view=rev
> Log:
> - Revert the fix, since the situation described in the bug is not valid (and
> I'm afraid my boss would murder me
> if there's a re
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> It's possible it would not cause any regression, I don't know for sure
> (it's a bit the issue).
>
> The original claim was to fix 39704, which cannot be fixed (the bug is
> really invalid, for the reasons I stated inside the bug, since when
> creating the loader the privil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Apache Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability
of Tomcat 4.1.34-beta. This release is a bug fix release that resolves
the issues reported against Tomcat 4.1.32-beta. Please consult the
release notes included in the distributions
Sriram Narayanan wrote:
> On 9/12/06, Yoav Shapira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I would prefer #2, to give the user(s) a chance to help us out or at
>> least tell us they're no longer using that Tomcat version, or
>> whatever.
>>
>
> Ack. Thanks.
So far you seem to be too quick to mark things
Bill Barker wrote:
> But in this case, almost all of them are for 3.2.x, which hasn't had a
> maintainer in over five years :). IMHO, you could mark them all as WONTFIX.
> I'm happy enough that Sriram is actually testing against 3.3.2.
Anyone looking at open bugs is a good thing and I welcome Sri
Hari Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
> I am getting null when I use Tomcat 4.1 Server.
>
> Please check the code and let me know the possible solution.
This question belongs on the users mailing list. Please see
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html for further information.
Mark
-
Steve Gaunt wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I am trying to set up SSL working within tomcat(as part of Jboss 4.01).
This question belongs on the users list, not the dev list.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additio
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Apache Tomcat v5.5.20 is:
> [X] +1 Stable - no major issues
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sun Oct 1 15:43:11 2006
>> New Revision: 451831
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=451831
>> Log:
>> Fix bug 34956. Ensure requestDispatchers are called with original or
>> wrapped original request/respons
Bill Barker wrote:
> I'd have probably been less strict, and just thrown an ISE from
> ApplicationDispatcher.wrapRequest/wrapResponse. Mine allows somebody that
> really wants to program against Tomcat sidestep the check, but doesn't add
> as much overhead.
I see how this would be lower overhe
Mladen Turk wrote:
> [X] I'm for that proposal
> [ ] I'm against that proposal
> [ ] I don't care
If you believe there is a requirement for it, the implementation can
be done cleanly and you are prepared to support it then go for it.
I would like to echo Yoav's comments that the docs should be up
All,
4.1.34-beta has been available for just over a month. Tomcat 4.1.34
fixes all open bugs against the 4.1.x branch and updates the libraries
to the latest versions. Please vote on its stability using the options
below.
I will also solicit feedback from the users list in case someone has
found
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 is:
> [X] Stable - no major issues
> [ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
> [ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Mark
Peter Rossbach wrote:
>> Apache Tomcat 4.1.34 is:
>> [x ] Stable - no major issues
>
> I found only a small issue at service.bat
Peter,
I haven't forgotten this. It is sat in my inbox waiting for me to find
the time to look at it.
Mark
---
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Is there still interest to migrate ? Personally, I am interested in
> using JIRA for TC 6 (mainly because the bugzilla project does not work,
What is broken? It looks OK but I didn't go as far as actually creating
a bug.
Mark
-
Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone bump the "production quality" release number in the little
> table in the "Apache Tomcat Versions" to 5.5.20?
> It is still 5.5.17 in there.
Done. Thanks for pointing this out. The mirror will take a little while
to sync up.
Mark
---
The votes were as follows:
Mark Thomas+1
Yoav Shapira +1
Remy Maucherat +1
Peter Rossbach +1
The vote therefore passes. I'll update the web site and send out an
announcement.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [
The Apache Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability
of Tomcat 4.1.34 stable. This build contains numerous bug fixes,
documentation updates, and other improvements.
Apache Tomcat is an implementation of the Java Server Pages 1.2 and Java
Servlet 2.3 specifications.
Please refer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> 1) How to control the request.getServerName() value when using tomcat as
> webserver ?
> 2) How to control the request.getServerName() value when using Apache as
> webserver (ajp13 connector) ?
These questions belong on the users list. Please read
http:/
> [X] +1
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 13/10/2011 12:32, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46264
>
> --- Comment #19 from Konstantin Kolinko 2011-10-13
> 11:32:13 UTC ---
> (In reply to comment #18)
>> Created attachment 27767 [details]
>
> Re: startStopExecutor.allowCoreThreadTimeOut
On 13/10/2011 13:10, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/13 Mark Thomas :
>>
>>> In one place Future is used, while I think it could be Future like
>>> in
>>> other places.
>>
>> That is the difference between a callable and runnable and I think i
On 13/10/2011 21:34, ma...@apache.org wrote:
>
> Modified: tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/deploy/WebXml.java
> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/deploy/WebXml.java?rev=1183078&r1=1183077&r2=1183078&view=diff
>
On 14/10/2011 00:07, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/14 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Oct 13 22:28:22 2011
>> New Revision: 1183142
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1183142&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Cache the result of parsing global and host defaults for web.xml to speed up
>> web app
On 14/10/2011 09:15, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/14 David Blevins :
>> We've been using plain Tomcat zips for creating TomEE in the
>> OpenEJB maven build for a while now. So far that has been done by
>> publishing the Tomcat zips to a maven repo in svn. Not the best
>> idea to have them
On 14/10/2011 09:27, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> 2011/10/10 Konstantin Kolinko :
>> 2011/10/9 Olivier Lamy :
>>> tomcat.getConnector().setPort( 0 );
>>
>> 1) Look at how TomcatBaseTest assigns subsequent port numbers,
>> starting with 8001.
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/trunk/test/org/apache/
On 14/10/2011 00:20, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 14/10/2011 00:07, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>> 2011/10/14 :
>>> Author: markt
>>> Date: Thu Oct 13 22:28:22 2011
>>> New Revision: 1183142
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1183142&am
On 14/10/2011 14:10, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/14 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Fri Oct 14 12:55:55 2011
>> New Revision: 1183340
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1183340&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix typo
>>
>> Modified:
>>tomcat/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/startup/ContextConf
On 14/10/2011 14:51, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/14 Mark Thomas :
>> On 14/10/2011 14:10, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>>> 2011/10/14 :
>>>> Author: markt
>>>> Date: Fri Oct 14 12:55:55 2011
>>>> New Revision: 1183340
>>>>
&g
On 14/10/2011 17:09, David Jencks wrote:
> If using a non-tomcat groupId is the
> only choice I'd keep the openejb copy in apache svn.
That is not an option that is acceptable to the ASF infrastructure team.
Mark
-
To unsubscrib
On 14/10/2011 17:09, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2011, at 4:06 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Since the requirements for this are driven by the OpenEJB project
>> and - as far as I am aware - they are the only folks with this
>> requirement, I suggest that OpenEJB runs
On 14/10/2011 17:40, David Jencks wrote:
>
> On Oct 14, 2011, at 9:18 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>
>> On 14/10/2011 17:09, David Jencks wrote:
>>> If using a non-tomcat groupId is the only choice I'd keep the
>>> openejb copy in apache svn.
>>
>> T
On 14/10/2011 17:53, Henri Gomez wrote:
>> Granted, the Tomcat project currently has no interest in using Maven as
>> a build system but that doesn't mean Maven is ignored. A lot of work
>> went into improving the Maven artefacts for Tomcat 7.
>
>
> Use of Maven was allready discussed many times
On 14/10/2011 19:00, Francis Galiegue wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have lost the discussion, but remember one thing having been
> discussed today about the git repo for tomcat 7.x being broken because
> its trunk followed 8.0-dev instead (I did notice that but thought it
> was on purpose).
>
> Do 8.0.x
On 14/10/2011 15:00, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/14 Mark Thomas :
>>> How? Some git push (or haw it is called there?) that writes directly
>>> to the repository?
>>
>> git svn dcommit
>>
>> See:
>> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAt
On 15/10/2011 11:02, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> How do you run git? Do you use Cygwin, or maybe TortoiseGit?
http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/downloads/list
> I think http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache might need to be updated
> to reflect the issue, but I am not yet sure what the correc
On 17/10/2011 09:22, Oliver Wulff wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> I've attached an initial version of the patch for the following
> bugzilla task:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51334
>
> I'd like to initiate a discussion how to bundle and integrate this
> into tomcat. I've added a
On 17/10/2011 15:29, Oliver Wulff wrote:
> Hi Mark
>
> Thanks for your quick feedback...
>
> There are two pieces - IDP and authenticator - where we have to
> decide how to package this.
>
> Given that Tomcat doesn't support web services out of the box, I
> don't think it makes sense to sh
On 19/10/2011 15:16, Oliver Wulff wrote:
> Hi Mark
>
> The lack of demand argument applies equally to WS-Federation
> considered in isolation. I'd like to see that there was at least some
> traction behind this in the Tomcat community before going with option
> 2.
>
> I understand wher
On 20/10/2011 08:00, kfuj...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: kfujino
> Date: Thu Oct 20 07:00:57 2011
> New Revision: 1186631
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1186631&view=rev
> Log:
> Avoid an unnecessary session ID change notice.
Given this...
> Notice of changed session ID by JvmRouteBind
On 20/10/2011 10:07, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/20 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Oct 19 20:55:39 2011
>> New Revision: 1186485
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1186485&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Fix https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52055
>> Buffers not correctly re
On 20/10/2011 17:41, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/20 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Oct 20 16:32:12 2011
>> New Revision: 1186898
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1186898&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Clean-up. No functional change.
>
> Empty commit. You merged r1186891 (Oliver's commit
On 21/10/2011 16:44, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> 2011/10/21 :
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Fri Oct 21 15:07:51 2011
>> New Revision: 1187387
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1187387&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Ensure the the memory leak protection for the HttpClient keep-alive always
>> operates
301 - 400 of 9355 matches
Mail list logo
