Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] OpenEJB 7.0.0-M1/TomEE 7.0.0-M1 (staging-1052)

Then I'll cancel and re-roll On 9 July 2015 at 21:35, Mark Struberg wrote: > Oki fine, will release OWB. > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 09.07.2015 um 20:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > all is done > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau | Blog

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] OpenEJB 7.0.0-M1/TomEE 7.0.0-M1 (staging-1052)

Oki fine, will release OWB. LieGrue, strub > Am 09.07.2015 um 20:48 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > all is done > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Github | > LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] OpenEJB 7.0.0-M1/TomEE 7.0.0-M1 (staging-1052)

all is done Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber 2015-07-09 11:46 GMT-07:00 Mark Struberg

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] OpenEJB 7.0.0-M1/TomEE 7.0.0-M1 (staging-1052)

I’ve not seen any OWB JIRA, did you create one and already fix it or is there something to do? LieGrue, strub > Am 09.07.2015 um 20:14 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > the "not create a session everytime" (which is an important fix but then we > compromised session events) > > > Romain Manni

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] OpenEJB 7.0.0-M1/TomEE 7.0.0-M1 (staging-1052)

the "not create a session everytime" (which is an important fix but then we compromised session events) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] OpenEJB 7.0.0-M1/TomEE 7.0.0-M1 (staging-1052)

hmm why? what happened, which parts did we change which trashed the TCK? LieGrue, strub > Am 09.07.2015 um 18:14 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > 1.6.2 AFAIK. 1.6.1 doesnt pass TCK. > Le 9 juil. 2015 08:52, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > >> oki then go and ship a new build. But we shoud really

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] OpenEJB 7.0.0-M1/TomEE 7.0.0-M1 (staging-1052)

1.6.2 AFAIK. 1.6.1 doesnt pass TCK. Le 9 juil. 2015 08:52, "Mark Struberg" a écrit : > oki then go and ship a new build. But we shoud really push for it! > update to owb-1.6.1 is done on trunk? Release branch got rebased? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > Am 09.07.2015 um 16:21 schrieb Romain Manni-B

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] OpenEJB 7.0.0-M1/TomEE 7.0.0-M1 (staging-1052)

oki then go and ship a new build. But we shoud really push for it! update to owb-1.6.1 is done on trunk? Release branch got rebased? LieGrue, strub > Am 09.07.2015 um 16:21 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > Le 9 juil. 2015 05:08, "Andy Gumbrecht" a écrit : >> >> It may actually be worth cancel

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] OpenEJB 7.0.0-M1/TomEE 7.0.0-M1 (staging-1052)

Le 9 juil. 2015 05:08, "Andy Gumbrecht" a écrit : > > It may actually be worth cancelling this vote and rolling again. WDYT? <-- > Let's not vote on that, but there have been some fixes already. Are they > significant enough? > +1 - even thought it has been decided to be honest ;) > Andy. > > On

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] OpenEJB 7.0.0-M1/TomEE 7.0.0-M1 (staging-1052)

It may actually be worth cancelling this vote and rolling again. WDYT? <-- Let's not vote on that, but there have been some fixes already. Are they significant enough? Andy. On 9 July 2015 at 10:21, Jonathan Gallimore wrote: > I'll try and get some time to review and vote. Sorry for the delay.

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] OpenEJB 7.0.0-M1/TomEE 7.0.0-M1 (staging-1052)

I'll try and get some time to review and vote. Sorry for the delay. Jon > On 9 Jul 2015, at 08:50, Mark Struberg wrote: > > Whoops, just figured that Jeff is not a TomEE PMC so the vote did NOT pass > yet… > > Andy, others, what to do? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > >> Am 09.07.2015 um 08:5

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] OpenEJB 7.0.0-M1/TomEE 7.0.0-M1 (staging-1052)

Whoops, just figured that Jeff is not a TomEE PMC so the vote did NOT pass yet… Andy, others, what to do? LieGrue, strub > Am 09.07.2015 um 08:53 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi! > > Time to tally the VOTE. > > The VOTE has passed with the following: > > +1 Jeff Genender, JL Monteiro, Mark