Re: Protocol of Arquillian Embedded Adapter

2015-10-05 Thread Alex Soto
If there are bugs/improvements let s do it. I am thinking in terms of doing the life of developers easier and in fact changing the protocol to servlet dos not introduce (a priori) any back incompatibility but a lot of extensions are going to work with embedded mode. Alex. El dg, 4 oct 2015 a les

Re: Would like to help

2015-10-05 Thread Thusitha Thilina Dayaratne
Hi Daniel, I'm not 100% sure But I think we can check the open issues[1] in TomEE Jira and try to fix them and then send pull requests. [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:issues-panel 2015-10-03 6:28 GMT+05:30 Daniel Bickler :

Re: Would like to help

2015-10-05 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
Hi Daniel, Nice to virtually meet you. My name is Jean-Louis and I am in France. Indeed, the best way to get in the project is to have a look at the current open issues, pick one you'd like to work on and shoot an email here. We can give you some directions on how to solve it and push a patch. I

Re: Protocol of Arquillian Embedded Adapter

2015-10-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 5 oct. 2015 09:26, "Alex Soto" a écrit : > > If there are bugs/improvements let s do it. I am thinking in terms of doing > the life of developers easier and in fact changing the protocol to servlet > dos not introduce (a priori) any back incompatibility but a lot of > extensions are going to wo

Re: Protocol of Arquillian Embedded Adapter

2015-10-05 Thread John D. Ament
The fundamental problem (if I had to guess) is that let's say I'm testing a REST API (heck even using the REST extension), persistence extension doesn't know that my request went through since I'm controlling it, so its call backs won't take effect. By running embedded, you're more likely to not b

Re: Protocol of Arquillian Embedded Adapter

2015-10-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
You can see it the opposite as well ie you go through http where you can not desire it. 50-50 case i think. Le 5 oct. 2015 13:52, "John D. Ament" a écrit : > The fundamental problem (if I had to guess) is that let's say I'm testing a > REST API (heck even using the REST extension), persistence e

Re: Protocol of Arquillian Embedded Adapter

2015-10-05 Thread Alex Soto
But what is the advantage of using local instead of http? I am sure that the performance is going to be pretty similar. El dl., 5 oct. 2015 a les 14:01, Romain Manni-Bucau () va escriure: > You can see it the opposite as well ie you go through http where you can > not desire it. > > 50-50 case i

Re: Protocol of Arquillian Embedded Adapter

2015-10-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Perf are not the same for sure but the advantage is to not go through HTTP layer: - control of threads - control of state "as usual" etc... local is the more enhanced version of the embedded behavior arquillian promotes. Servlet reaches 80% only of it with arq 1.x - which is already insane but s