Re: "Umbrella" discussion

2018-04-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Le 12 avr. 2018 23:24, "gilbertoca" a écrit : Guys, just a user here. >From my experience, no one knows the Geronimo project[1] (for me it appears a retired/dead one). Everyone I talk with thinks everything is in TomEE (I thought like this before). Now, after read about

Re: "Umbrella" discussion

2018-04-12 Thread gilbertoca
Guys, just a user here. >From my experience, no one knows the Geronimo project[1] (for me it appears a retired/dead one). Everyone I talk with thinks everything is in TomEE (I thought like this before). Now, after read about the project in the mail-list (several discussion by the way) I

Re: [RESULT] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

2018-04-12 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
why -> for consistency accross our coupled communities why does it matter if it is in G for T? -> it doesn't Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book 2018-04-12 15:56 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead : > we already include

Re: [RESULT] Explore creating a reusable JWT Library

2018-04-12 Thread Matthew Broadhead
we already include libraries from geronimo, e.g. javamail, so why does it matter where the library resides as long as it can be included in the package On 11/04/2018 15:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: Hi Matthew, No, technicall there are a lot of small things to do before it can be "included"