Re: Help appreciated - Test failure: org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.passivating.dependency.resource.persistence.DataSourcePassivationDependencyTest

org.jboss.cdi.tck.impl.testng. >> > SingleTestClassMethodInterceptor intercept >> > INFO: tckTest not set [time: 0 ms] >> > Jul 09, 2018 10:15:57 PM org.jboss.cdi.tck.impl.testng. >> > SingleTestClassMethodInterceptor intercept >> > INFO:

Re: Help appreciated - Test failure: org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.passivating.dependency.resource.persistence.DataSourcePassivationDependencyTest

[time: 30 ms] > > Jul 09, 2018 10:15:57 PM org.jboss.cdi.tck.shrinkwrap.ArchiveBuilder > build > > INFO: Test archive built [info: org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests. > > context.passivating.dependency.resource.persistence. > > DataSourcePassivationDependencyTes

Re: Help appreciated - Test failure: org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.passivating.dependency.resource.persistence.DataSourcePassivationDependencyTest

ry > > INFO: Support library built [time: 83 ms] > > Jul 09, 2018 10:15:57 PM org.jboss.cdi.tck.shrinkwrap.ArchiveBuilder > > buildIncontainerLibrary > > INFO: Incontainer library built [time: 30 ms] > > Jul 09, 2018 10:15:57 PM org.jboss.cdi.tck.shrinkwrap.Archi

Re: Help appreciated - Test failure: org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.passivating.dependency.resource.persistence.DataSourcePassivationDependencyTest

x27; > 09-Jul-2018 22:15:57.586 INFO [main] org.apache.openejb.util. > OptionsLog.info Using 'openejb.jdbc.datasource- > creator=org.apache.tomee.jdbc.TomEEDataSourceCreator' > 09-Jul-2018 22:15:57.634 INFO [main] org.apache.openejb.util. > OptionsLog.info Using 'openejb.deploymentId.format={

Help appreciated - Test failure: org.jboss.cdi.tck.tests.context.passivating.dependency.resource.persistence.DataSourcePassivationDependencyTest

5:57.718 INFO [main] org.apache.openejb.OpenEJB$Instance. Version: 7.0.5 09-Jul-2018 22:15:57.719 INFO [main] org.apache.openejb.OpenEJB$Instance. Build date: 20180709 09-Jul-2018 22:15:57.719 INFO [main] org.apache.openejb.OpenEJB$Instance. Build time: 09:

7.0.5 status

FYI - I have a failing test here, so I'm just looking into that before pushing ahead with the second vote. That might mean the vote is tomorrow morning as opposed to tonight. Jon

Register now for ApacheCon and save $250

Greetings, Apache software enthusiasts! (You’re getting this because you’re on one or more dev@ or users@ lists for some Apache Software Foundation project.) ApacheCon North America, in Montreal, is now just 80 days away, and early bird prices end in just two weeks - on July 21. Prices will b

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

Ah, thanks. I appreciate it. On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:11 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Just for reference on the saml issue: > http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Missing-Guava- > in-TomEE-7-0-4-Plus-td4684068.html > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau |

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

Just for reference on the saml issue: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Missing-Guava-in-TomEE-7-0-4-Plus-td4684068.html Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github

[CANCELLED] [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

Hi This vote is cancelled, and the release will be re-rolled and voting started again. A huge thank you to everyone who has tested and provided feedback so far, it is greatly appreciated, and new binaries should be available to check this evening. Jon On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Jonathan Gal

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

My apologies - OpenJPA is at 2.4.3, I missed it off my list earlier. Jon On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: > And OpenJPA-2.4.3 > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > > Am 09.07.2018 um 14:20 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >: > > > > +1, good catch! > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibu

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

And OpenJPA-2.4.3 LieGrue, strub > Am 09.07.2018 um 14:20 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > +1, good catch! > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

+1, good catch! Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

Hi Alexandre Thanks for the feedback. All, this vote will be cancelled, and we are re-rolling. Any objections to including Tomcat 8.5.32? Jon On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Alex The Rocker wrote: > Hello, > > +1 (non binding) > > Used this 7.0.5 release candidate to deploy 15+ different web

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

I'll apply the change and get ready for the re-roll. I'll leave this open for a few hours in case anyone wants to get any other feedback in. Should have new binaries up for fresh vote tonight. Thanks for the review Romain! Jon On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Le lun

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

Le lun. 9 juil. 2018 à 11:44, Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> a écrit : > I'm happy to re-roll without that library. > > I don't know what the CXF/SAML issue is - I am happy to have a go at fixing > it if there is some detail somewhere (pointers appreciated). > IIRC java-suppor

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

I'm happy to re-roll without that library. I don't know what the CXF/SAML issue is - I am happy to have a go at fixing it if there is some detail somewhere (pointers appreciated). Is this a regression, or are we looking to improve something? If my opinion counts for anything, I'd suggest we re-r

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

I don't think we really do or we ever did. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > I trust you Jon that it was broken in 7.0.4, but it is not OK to keep it. > This particular dep can just be d

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

I trust you Jon that it was broken in 7.0.4, but it is not OK to keep it. This particular dep can just be drop (so easy fix). The java-support issue is more impacting and was completely missed in last release cycles (guess we dont test saml?) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

:s, IMHO we must fix it - or do you see the legal requirements anywhere? also we have that java-support issue (which beaks cxf/saml support in 7.0.4 since we dont provide guava), do we want to re-release a broken distro since it has been broken in 7.0.4? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

I will note that I am of course happy to either: a) track down why that is now included, and remove it if appropriate b) modify the license/notice files as appropriate and re-roll. A note on dependencies - there a is legal report in the original post which should contain all the details for revi

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

That library was also present in 7.0.4 Plus. Jon On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi, > > It seems we bundle javax.xml.soap-api-1.3.5.jar now in plus flavor (guess > it is a "leak" due to some dep upgrade), its license is CDDL+GPL1.1. I > didn't see the notice/licens

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

I haven't checked this part, but you are correct, we used to have a tool with a report for the license thing -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi, > > It seems we bundle javax.xml.soap-a

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

Hi, It seems we bundle javax.xml.soap-api-1.3.5.jar now in plus flavor (guess it is a "leak" due to some dep upgrade), its license is CDDL+GPL1.1. I didn't see the notice/license work done. Was it intended or as I'm thinking a silent transitive issue? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

+1 Build ok Small demo and test applications running. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 9:57 AM, Alex The Rocker wrote: > Hello, > > +1 (non binding) > > Used this 7.0.5 release candidate to deploy 15+ different web apps >

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.0.5

Hello, +1 (non binding) Used this 7.0.5 release candidate to deploy 15+ different web apps (including one on Windows, all others on Linux) using very different aspects of Java EE. All running with ORACLE Server JRE 8 update 172. And got no regression as far as we're checking tests results. But i