Re: Bouncy Castle

Awesome, thanks! On Tue, Aug 7, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Jon, > > wss4j needs it. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Blog > | Github

Re: Bouncy Castle

Hi Jon, wss4j needs it. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Bouncy Castle

We ship bcprov with TomEE 7.0.5 Plume and Plus (not webprofile). We include it in openejb-cxf. Should we? If so, out of curiosity (and I suspect I'll kick myself when someone tells me the answer...), what do we use it for? Jon

Re: TomEE 8 Jsonb Provider

would work, A then Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book

Re: TomEE 8 Jsonb Provider

Hello Mark, Non-binding: +1 for you proposal A) to release a TomEE 8.0.0 before Jakarta TCKs are available, and call the Jakarta Tc's-certified version a 8.1.x : simple and efficient ! Thanks, Alexandre Le mar. 7 août 2018 à 14:33, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > Folks, probably it's easier to push

Re: TomEE 8 Jsonb Provider

Folks, probably it's easier to push hard for a first TomEE8 release? Things like the JsonbProvider will fall into place quite naturally. We just have to be clear about how we name that baby. So far we have 2 options on the table: A.) Go 8.0.0, 8.0.1, etc now and openly declaring that we address

Re: Logging level

Ah, thought to be on the OpenJPA list. But over here just go for it ;) LieGrue, strub > Am 07.08.2018 um 14:25 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Sure, go for it. Patch welcome ;) > > LieGrue, > strub > > >> Am 03.08.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore >> : >> >> Any objections if I flip

Re: Logging level

Sure, go for it. Patch welcome ;) LieGrue, strub > Am 03.08.2018 um 22:06 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore > : > > Any objections if I flip this to INFO? Its useful to see without turning on > debug logging. > >