Hm. Well, there are over 800 Resolved tickets dating back to 2013 so I
don't think they get moved to closed when a release comes out. There are
an equal number marked as "Closed" so it seems to me that "Resolved" and
"Closed" is a matter of style which I think is something we should get away
from
jgallimore merged pull request #453: Replace `openejb` references in
deployments.adoc
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/453
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
doychin commented on a change in pull request #451: Remove unused method
(tomee-2499)
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/451#discussion_r270573483
##
File path:
container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/assembler/classic/Assembler.java
##
@@ -2259,22
AndyGee commented on issue #293: WIP - experimentation with Java 11
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/293#issuecomment-478144928
@jgallimore 12 is out now ;-)
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
T
AndyGee commented on a change in pull request #451: Remove unused method
(tomee-2499)
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/451#discussion_r270568206
##
File path:
container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/assembler/classic/Assembler.java
##
@@ -2259,22
AndyGee commented on a change in pull request #451: Remove unused method
(tomee-2499)
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/451#discussion_r270568013
##
File path:
container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/assembler/classic/Assembler.java
##
@@ -2259,22
I created the TomEEOpenAPIExtension that wrapper the
GeronimoOpenAPIExtension.
My question is, how can I shut down the GeronimoOpenAPIExtension extension?
I tried to append this value at system.properties:
openejb.classloader.forced-skip=org.apache.geronimo.microprofile.openapi.cdi
But it does no
AndyGee commented on issue #452: Make ArrayEnumeration generics aware
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/452#issuecomment-478143480
@jgallimore wdyt?
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
AndyGee commented on issue #360: Cleanup test code and also minor changes in
the tested class.
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/360#issuecomment-478142466
@jgallimore this looks good to me. WDYT?
This is an automated
eminence opened a new pull request #453: Replace `openejb` references in
deployments.adoc
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/453
This file is hosted at http://tomee.apache.org/deployments.html
Note there is still a broken link to "OPENEJB:Configuration", but I don't
know wher
And also, not saying it's optimal or we could not do otherwise if that
makes more sense.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:10 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> I haven't done a release for a while
I haven't done a release for a while so trying to speak from what I recall.
But others can correct me.
When a ticket is being worked on by someone, we assign it to the
contributor.
Discussion is going to happen on the mailing list and at some point
contributor asks for review on the mailing list.
Could you clarify the use of "Resolved" for me? I was under the impression
that a Ticket was marked "Resolved", as opposed to "Closed", when the
contributor had finished working on it and was waiting for someone to
review. What am I missing?
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 10:53 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
I would need to refresh my mind on this.
There are many libraries to update and a lot of work to do.
Upgrading XBean on 7.1.x can be done, but under the cover ASM is updated
too (shaded) and I'm not sure about the consequences.
>From a community point of view, I am not sure we can yet start backp
done.
Marked as resolved because we close during release only
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 5:58 AM Richard Monson-Haefel <
monsonhae...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This ticket was already merged (https://github.com/apache/tomee
Rafael (or anyone):
This ticket has been worked on since December of 2018. It seems to leave
off with a question from Rafael. Could someone take a look at it and let
me know if it should be closed? (Also, if should be closed, than please
close it because I cannot do that).
https://jira.apache.
Unfortunately, this approach does not work.
ProxyFactory proxyFactory = new ProxyFactory();
proxyFactory.setSuperclass(Application.class);
proxyFactory.setFilter(new MethodFilter() {
public boolean isHandled(Method m) {
return !m.getName().equals("finalize");
}
});
Class aClass =
This ticket was already merged (https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/391)
but remains InProgress. I can't change it to closed. Can someone do that
please?
--
Richard Monson-Haefel
https://twitter.com/rmonson
https://www.linkedin.com/in/monsonhaefel/
Jean-Louis,
This bug, reported by and assigned to Salomon Mayengue, has what looks like
closing comments referencing TOMEE-2272 which you fixed. Can you take a
look at it and determine if it should be closed or merged or whatever?
It's been unresolved since Feb 8th. Let me know the outcome if yo
19 matches
Mail list logo
