[GitHub] [tomee] rzo1 commented on pull request #883: Tomee 3824

rzo1 commented on PR #883: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/883#issuecomment-1123234218 I think you are right @cesarhernandezgt if I am following the discussion on the list correctly. @tichovz Would you mind chaning the target to `master` ` -- This is an automated message from th

Re: How Can I Help with the Apache Microprofile implementation

Hi, the ASF impls of the MP specifications are hosted by the Geronimo project. Yes - you are right. We would need to update every MP specification in Geronimo and add / update the related implementation. That involves finding the differences between each version, writing tests, etc. In the end i

Re: MicroProfile JWT 2.0 support

Hi, you can find the MP TCK Harness (which is run in the TomEE build) here: https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/tck/microprofile-tck/jwt The actual MP JWT TCK tsts are in this artifact org.eclipse.microprofile.jwt microprofile-jwt-auth-tck the related repository of the MP JWT TCK sourc

Re: MicroProfile JWT 2.0 support

Helping on TOMEE-3948 in some way, sounds good to me . I'll start by reviewing the Spec and then the TCK. Regarding the Spec, I found this so I assume that's where the spec is published, but

Re: MicroProfile JWT 2.0 support

Hi Memo! First, thanks for volunteering! Thrilled to work on this with you. On TOMEE-3952, are you open to a different task? One of the first things I'll do with TOMEE-3947 is replace the code that parses keys and either our code will conflict and I'll likely end up needing to rewrite your cod

Re: MicroProfile JWT 2.0 support

Hello David. I'd like to work on some of them. So if you don't mind, I'd like to start with TOMEE-3952. El mar, 10 may 2022 a las 12:00, David Blevins () escribió: > I'm starting to take a look at what we need to implement MicroProfile JWT > 2.0 support. > > There are no new requirements in 2.0

[GitHub] [tomee] cesarhernandezgt commented on pull request #883: Tomee 3824

cesarhernandezgt commented on PR #883: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/883#issuecomment-1122907477 Hi @tichovz , thank you for the PR. The PR is against apache:develop (last updated back in 2015); perhaps you may want to open this against the current Master branch? -- This is

[GitHub] [tomee] tichovz opened a new pull request, #883: Tomee 3824

tichovz opened a new pull request, #883: URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/883 I create a new method into ObjectFactory and a new test method, where unmarshalling the web-fragment.xml is successful. Sorry I made a code format in JeeTest.java. Unfortunately I do not know how to

Re: TOMEE-3824 New Jakarta EE 9 XML namespace not recognized in web-fragment.xml (was Re: How can I help?)

Hi Zoltán! Really fantastic you have something working! If you create a PR that'a the best way to say "here are my changes, can you please review?" - https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-req

Re: TOMEE-3824 New Jakarta EE 9 XML namespace not recognized in web-fragment.xml (was Re: How can I help?)

Hi David! I made some changes and a testcase, how can I show these changes to somebody? Which JDK should I use? Now I use adoptOpenJDK 11 to run the tests. Thanks: Zoltán On Fri, May 6, 2022 at 1:27 AM David Blevins wrote: > Hey Zoltán! > > Absolutely, you're welcome to fix the issue. I can a

MicroProfile JWT 2.0 support

I'm starting to take a look at what we need to implement MicroProfile JWT 2.0 support. There are no new requirements in 2.0 itself. That version was largely created to communicate MicroProfile overall upgraded from Jakarta EE 8 to 9.1. There are a handful of new requirements 1.2 we have yet to

How Can I Help with the Apache Microprofile implementation

Hi All, I've been reading the mailing list and noticed that it was decided to use smallRye in some cases. I would like to help with the Apache implementation and as far as I understand, those are outdated.

Re: TomEE 9.x - from javax to jakarta namespace

Was checking out the TCK numbers this morning can make to suggest a 9.0.0-M8 while things look good and found this amazing email. The 9.0.x branch is looking absolutely amazing!!! What do we think about pushing out a 9.0.0-M8 while things are in their peak-stable state? I'm sure we'll have to

Re: TomEE 9.x - from javax to jakarta namespace

Thank you Alex. Community work :-) Still a lot energy to spend before we can get a GA, but moving in the right direction -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 1:01 PM Alex The Rocker wrote: > Hello Jean-Louis, > > Huge, you

Re: TomEE 9.x - from javax to jakarta namespace

Hello Jean-Louis, Huge, you rock ! Alex Le jeu. 24 mars 2022 à 10:27, Jean-Louis Monteiro a écrit : > > Hi, > > Some additional notes based on current progress. > > We have successfully created a maintenance branch for TomEE 8.x with all > associated builds on Jenkins. > > We have been able to

Re: TomEE 9.x - from javax to jakarta namespace

Hi all, Time for some reporting On our journey to migrate TomEE over from javax to jakarta namespace, we had many issues. After updating all our code, we had to do a bunch of dependency upgrades after upgrading many of them (OpenWebbeans, BVal, Geronimo, etc). We then faced many issues with