Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.1.5

2022-08-02 Thread Alex The Rocker
Hello, [-1] (non binding) Indeed, I downloaded TomEE+ 7.1.5 binary (from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1206/tomee-7.1.5/apache-tomee-7.1.5-plus.tar.gz) and then I ran Grype (https://github.com/anchore/grype) on TomEE+'s archive extract directory. That gives 2 Critical and

Re: [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.1.5

2022-08-02 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
-1 (binding) Something went bad during the release. Looks like our libs are still 1.7.5-SNAPSHOT. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 2:37 PM Alex The Rocker wrote: > Hello, > > [-1] (non binding) > > Indeed, I downloaded Tom

[CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.1.5

2022-08-02 Thread Zowalla, Richard
Hi, thanks for the concerns raised. Better to check the CVE report and do a re-roll ;-) @JL: Will take a look. @Alex Thanks. We might not be able to address all CVEs as some of the libs used for EE7 aren't patched / updated anymore. I will have a look. Gruß Richard ___

Maintain 7.1.x branch (was [CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.1.5)

2022-08-02 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
Hi all, Don't want to hijack the other thread, so starting a new one based on the discussion. I don't think releasing a "last 7.1.x" version with CVEs would be of > any good I join Alex on this one. Does it really make sense to release a TomEE app server with known CVEs? I'm not arguing on the

Re: Maintain 7.1.x branch (was [CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.1.5)

2022-08-02 Thread Richard Zowalla
Hi all, thanks for the thread, JL! Sorry, a bit longer than anticipated ;) As promised in the other thread, I took a look at the grype scan results. While were are many false positives (mostly related to the Geronimo specs and ActiveMQ), there are indeed some CVEs of interest: - cxf - tomcat (wi

Re: Maintain 7.1.x branch (was [CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.1.5)

2022-08-02 Thread Alex The Rocker
Hi Richard, I vote (non-binding) for option B, i.e. releasing a TomEE 7.1.5 with patched CVEs and annoucing that this will be the last one of 7.1.x series and that users must have a plan to migrate to 8.0.x (or 9.0.x when it'll be released). Thanks, Alex Le mar. 2 août 2022 à 20:19, Richard Zowa

Re: Maintain 7.1.x branch (was [CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.1.5)

2022-08-02 Thread David Blevins
My personal perspective is that if there are people who want to focus their time on 7.1.x (option B), I’m happy to let them. They would need to do a complete job however (I.e. not option A). That said, if I had to do the work it’d be option C, D, or E. My discomfort with labeling something EOL i

Re: TomEE 8.x build under JDK 11 and higher

2022-08-02 Thread Jonathan S. Fisher
Late reply: we're running Tomee 8.0.12 in prod with JDK 17 on 9 apps :) no issues to report. On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 3:56 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote: > Hi all, > > I took some time to fix a couple of things in the TomEE 8.x maintenance > branch so it can build under a JDK 11+ JVM. It's still bu

Re: Maintain 7.1.x branch (was [CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.1.5)

2022-08-02 Thread David Blevins
How about a simple “inactive” label? -David On Tue, Aug 2, 2022 at 2:41 PM David Blevins wrote: > My personal perspective is that if there are people who want to focus their > time on 7.1.x (option B), I’m happy to let them. They would need to do a > complete job however (I.e. not option A). >

Re: Maintain 7.1.x branch (was [CANCEL] [VOTE] Apache TomEE 7.1.5)

2022-08-02 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
Yeah if users want to maintain and fix third party libraries, I'm fine with that and I'm also fine to do a release when it's ok. Inactive is fine. We just need to find something and document it on our website. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On T