1) OpenJPA: couldnt we just set EclipseLink as our default for now? We dont
need to remove it, but leaving it as default is not a good decision.
2) BatchEE: Is there a alternative impl for now available? I can try to
migrate BatchEE to jakarta later but for now the highest prio for me and my
company to migrate to a EE10 container.
3) Concurency: Can you point me to the sources? I will try to work on it
upcoming week.

Am Fr., 5. Jan. 2024 um 11:07 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla <
rich...@zowalla.com>:

> I have tested a custom TomEE 10 build (with fixed deps) for quite a while
> now and it worked for my usecases.
>
> What needs to be done (imho):
>
> - We need to have stable versions for BatchEE and OpenJPA. Currently, they
> are only SNAPSHOT.
>
> - Implement the concurrency changes. Currently, they are only added as
> stub impls. (I am not using that in my test env, so didn't encounter issues)
>
> - TCK still hangs but isn't a blocker for a milestone imho.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Gruß
> Richard
>
>
> Am 5. Januar 2024 10:40:05 MEZ schrieb Thomas Andraschko <
> andraschko.tho...@gmail.com>:
> >i would like to have everything apache, too but i think our goal must be
> to
> >get a TomEE10-M1 release out ASAP.
> >we can later easily make openjpa the default again.
> >
> >how should we proceed here?
> >i have some time slots to work on something and provide PRs, we just need
> >some decisions.
> >
> >
> >Am Mo., 20. Nov. 2023 um 23:12 Uhr schrieb Jonathan S. Fisher <
> >exabr...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> If my opinion counts for anything, I'd love for TomEE to be based on
> >> Apache Foundation projects as much as possible. With JPA itself is
> >> just a large spec to cover, I can understand OpenJPA not having a
> >> current spec implementation and am still thankful for the past efforts
> >> of the committers on that project. My second choice would be
> >> EclipseLink over Hibernate, mainly because of speed, but also because
> >> many of the app servers in the space are already Weld + Hibernate +
> >> other various Redhat derivative projects. TomEE by far is enormously
> >> faster on startup and execution speed than OpenLiberty or WildFly
> >> (deploying the exact same WAR) and I'd be sad to lose that.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 9:46 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >> <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Thanks Thomas for pointing this out.
> >> > --
> >> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 4:06 PM Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Great news ;-)
> >> > >
> >> > > Am Montag, dem 20.11.2023 um 16:05 +0100 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> >> > > > JFYI: https://in.relation.to/2023/11/18/license/
> >> > > >
> >> > > > it seems they would like to move to another license
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Am Di., 7. Feb. 2023 um 16:16 Uhr schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> >> > > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > https://hibernate.org/community/license/
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Most Hibernate projects are released under LGPL v2.1
> >> > > > > <https://opensource.org/licenses/LGPL-2.1>.
> >> > > > > Only some sub projects are ASL v2
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >> > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >> > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Tue, Feb 7, 2023 at 4:12 PM Thomas Andraschko <
> >> > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > isnt hibernate licensed under Apache2.0?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Am Di., 7. Feb. 2023 um 16:10 Uhr schrieb Swell <
> >> > > > > souheil.sul...@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > > :
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Because of licenses we cannot ship with hibernate. Better be
> >> > > > > éclipselink
> >> > > > > > to
> >> > > > > > > avoid license hell.
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Tue 7 Feb 2023 at 16:08, Thomas Andraschko <
> >> > > > > > andraschko.tho...@gmail.com
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Hi,
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > AFAICS OpenJPA isnt in real active development and doenst
> >> > > > > > > > even
> >> > > > > support
> >> > > > > > > all
> >> > > > > > > > JPA 2.2 features.
> >> > > > > > > > Whats your plan for it?
> >> > > > > > > > Can't we just use Hibernate as default?
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Best regards,
> >> > > > > > > > Thomas
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jonathan | exabr...@gmail.com
> >> Pessimists, see a jar as half empty. Optimists, in contrast, see it as
> >> half full.
> >> Engineers, of course, understand the glass is twice as big as it needs
> to
> >> be.
> >>
>

Reply via email to