Hello Evaldo,
I agree with your suggestion.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 00:43 Evaldo Junior wrote:
> Richard, another alternative would be to place a deprecated annotation on
> the ImportSql class (item [1]) and add a comment in the class javadoc to
> use Flyway or Liquibase, instead of using the cl
Richard, another alternative would be to place a deprecated annotation on
the ImportSql class (item [1]) and add a comment in the class javadoc to
use Flyway or Liquibase, instead of using the class itself.
Evaldo Junior
[1]
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/main/container/openejb-core/src/
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #1470:
URL: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/1470
Bumps
[peter-evans/create-pull-request](https://github.com/peter-evans/create-pull-request)
from 6 to 7.
Release notes
Sourced from https://github.com/peter-evans/create-pull-request/r
AFAIK sticking to SXC is a decision purely made for startup performance
reasons, see David's reply in
https://lists.apache.org/thread/09powc11z4rnzvyzmt4xy5bcbrqwkfkh
On 03.09.24 13:43, Thomas Andraschko wrote:
i thought it in the past that i would be better to get rid of SXC
completely but ma
i thought it in the past that i would be better to get rid of SXC
completely but maybe thats a to big task:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/0p4m1rw8vmv17l29s1lgclsd9bfrr7s4
Am Di., 3. Sept. 2024 um 13:15 Uhr schrieb Markus Jung :
> Hey all,
>
>
> I had to modify the JAXB models in openejb-jee for
Hey all,
I had to modify the JAXB models in openejb-jee for the concurrency 3.0
implementation [1] but noticed the changes were not taken into affect.
This is where I found out what openejb-jee-accessors was for.
Long story short, I was not able to get the old SXC maven plugin running
and R
