Hi all,
+1 (non-binding) from me as well.
I tested with several applications (using EJB, CDI, JAX-RS, JPA, Bean
Validation, Transactions, Mail).
All seems to work well, had no issues. Thanks for the great work.
Grüße
Benedict
On 17.07.24 16:34, Martin Wiesner wrote:
Hi all,
+1 (non
+1 (non binding)
On 02.04.24 17:26, Daniel Dias Dos Santos wrote:
Hello,
+1
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024, 10:16 Thomas Andraschko
wrote:
+1
Am Di., 2. Apr. 2024 um 15:08 Uhr schrieb Markus Jung :
+1 (non binding)
Did some testing with our real apps (Java 17, GNU/Linux x86-64),
including:
-
JakartaEE 11 has 17 as a baseline for EE10 it is only 11.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Alex The Rocker
Datum: 31.03.24 13:22 (GMT+01:00) An:
dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: Re: AMQ6 in TomEE 10 Huge +1 for AMQ6.Requiring
Java 17+ isn't a problem, since (unless I'm
JakartaEE 11 has 17 as a baseline for EE10 it is only 11.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Alex The Rocker
Datum: 31.03.24 13:22 (GMT+01:00) An:
dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: Re: AMQ6 in TomEE 10 Huge +1 for AMQ6.Requiring
Java 17+ isn't a problem, since (unless I'm
I guess one would net to try, but I think there are definitely some
breaking changes.
In the Spec there is a Appendix about that:
https://jakarta.ee/specifications/servlet/6.0/jakarta-servlet-spec-6.0#changes-since-jakarta-servlet-5-0
The spec indirectly references this pull-request:
would be if there is any other TCK that needs working on and
that I can have a look at?
I have got some time next week and apparently nothing better to do ^^
Gruß Benedict
+1 for a milestone-releaseand it seems like the vote passed ~ an hour ago.
On 29.03.24 12:50, Richard Zowalla wrote:
Hi all,
just to give a short additional note here:
We are currently waiting for a Johnzon 2.0.1 vote to pass [1], which I
expect to be the case after Eastern has passed.
If no
+1 from me, I am currently porting some apps to JakartaEE. I would be happy to
test with a M1 version of tomee-10.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Richard Zowalla
Datum: 18.10.23 15:48 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: Re: OWB4
branch - how to proceed with EE10
+1 from me, I am currently porting some apps to JakartaEE. I would be happy to
test with a M1 version of tomee-10.
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Richard Zowalla
Datum: 18.10.23 15:48 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: Re: OWB4
branch - how to proceed with EE10
+1
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Richard Zowalla
Datum: 12.10.23 14:59 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: [VOTE]
TomEE 9.1.1 Hi all,this is a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 9.1.1.It is a
maintenance release with dependenciesupgrades and bug fixes. The most
+1
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Richard Zowalla
Datum: 12.10.23 14:59 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: [VOTE]
TomEE 9.1.1 Hi all,this is a vote for a release of Apache TomEE 9.1.1.It is a
maintenance release with dependenciesupgrades and bug fixes. The most
+1 for merging the PR, as to not loose sight of what is working and
what is not.
I think it is a good idea to add the profile for it and fix the tests on
main.
On 09.10.23 13:40, Richard Zowalla wrote:
I agree with you, Thomas ;-)
The initial problem is/was, that upgrading to EE-10 APIs has
+1
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Richard Zowalla
Datum: 29.09.23 15:40 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: TomEE
9.1.1 soon? Hi all,since we have now dropped our cxf shade in favour of 4.0.3
and fixedsome dependencies, etc. in the last weeks, what do you think about
+1
Ursprüngliche Nachricht Von: Richard Zowalla
Datum: 29.09.23 15:40 (GMT+01:00) An: dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: TomEE
9.1.1 soon? Hi all,since we have now dropped our cxf shade in favour of 4.0.3
and fixedsome dependencies, etc. in the last weeks, what do you think about
Hi Richard,
I have created a PR, for now with the copied files.
I am currently trying to run the tests with the staging repositories
dependency, which seems to work.
I think that would be acceptable at the moment, as we are still in
development?
Gruß Benedict
On 05.09.23 21:44, Richard
://mvnrepository.com/artifact/jakarta.ws
* Some google searches yielded no results as well
Maybe you or someone else has an idea where to look or could enlighten me.
On 04.09.23 17:27, Richard Zowalla wrote:
Hi Benedict,
perhaps worth to create a PR with the setup targeting the main branch, so
Great news.
I assume we can now much easier upgrade the cxf version as soon as the
JakartaEE 10 Support is finished by the cxf guys.
On 31.08.23 18:54, Richard Zowalla wrote:
Hey ladies,
some good news:
We are now passing the JAX-RS part of the EE9.1 tck with the latest CXF
4.0.3-SNAPSHOT
with JakartaEE10.
Gruß Benedict
On 04.09.23 14:40, Richard Zowalla wrote:
Hi all,
after the summer break:
What is our current progress / status regarding the EE10 TCK?
AFAIR, our plan was to setup the ee10 tck and run it against our
current EE9.1 compatible TomEE 10 impl? I know, we had some big bunch
PR
Small correction, I meant Richards-Branch, he shared in an other thread:
https://github.com/rzo1/tomee/tree/cxf4
On 18.08.23 19:15, Benedict Eisenkrämer wrote:
Hi,
I now have a kind of working setup for the tck, related to this
ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4166
which already
includes the newest cxf version and seems to have only four failures
with the old tck.
I think this should result in a few more tests succeeding, although cxf4
is not yet fully JakartaEE10 compatible.
Gruß Benedict
" tck to run your branch.
Gruß Benedict
On 18.08.23 08:01, Richard Zowalla wrote:
Hi Benedict,
perhaps worth a separate mail thread because it seems your repo is
about the ee10 rs tck (3.1.0) while the original intention of the
current thread is to get some feedback on the ee91 tck + cxf4.
r cfx-upgrade branch, maybe you can try it
on your machine to see if it runs there as well?
Gruß
Benedict
On 17.08.23 19:19, Richard Zowalla wrote:
Hi Benedict,
thanks for your answer. If possible, use the "cxf4" branch from [1] and
do a quick build without tests to get the a
Hi Richard,
with the current main branch and my messy try of a setup I get 151
Failed tests, many of which seem to be related to my faulty setup though.
Main issue on my end seems to be errors with deployment.
Gruß Benedict
On 17.08.23 17:29, Richard Zowalla wrote:
Hi,
I've been doing
on? I would intuitively go for main,
but maybe you have some other branch for 10.x development?
Best regards, Benedict
On 11.08.23 01:05, David Blevins wrote:
No worries on delays. We're all in the same boat there :)
If you want to dig into this issue a bit, that could be helpful:
-https
Hello,
I am quite new to this mailing-list so I thought I would introduce myself.
My name is Benedict and I am from Germany-Saarland. I work at a local
software-company as a software-architect and in that role maintain our
JavaEE, soon to be JakartaEE Framework.
We use tomee
25 matches
Mail list logo
