Re: "Umbrella" discussion

Le 12 avr. 2018 23:24, "gilbertoca" a écrit : Guys, just a user here. >From my experience, no one knows the Geronimo project[1] (for me it appears a retired/dead one). Everyone I talk with thinks everything is in TomEE (I thought like this before). Now, after read about the project in the mail-l

Re: "Umbrella" discussion

Guys, just a user here. >From my experience, no one knows the Geronimo project[1] (for me it appears a retired/dead one). Everyone I talk with thinks everything is in TomEE (I thought like this before). Now, after read about the project in the mail-list (several discussion by the way) I understan

Re: "Umbrella" discussion

I agree with Roberto, that we can create a distinct area under the TomEE PMC. Now we have a firm name 'Jakarta EE', I think we should grab that by the horns in some way and run with it! I feel that 'anything' EE should not land in 'commons', but should be actively promoted as an EE component o

Re: "Umbrella" discussion

Agree, there is no reason the relationship changes today and TomEE can continue to benefit from its server image and consume all the goodness coming from the brand new geronimo status/state without impacting/disturbing its own community. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau

Re: "Umbrella" discussion

Hi, I'll +1 on: 5.) Move the usable components to a disctinct area under the TomEE PMC, but with a separate brand name. It should _not_ be TomEE components, but something catchy Cheers,RobertoOn Sunday, February 25, 2018, 11:50:43 PM GMT, David Blevins wrote: Huge email, so if I don

Re: "Umbrella" discussion

Huge email, so if I don't respond to a point you were particularly interested in, do let me know. Adding some thoughts. > Again my argument: > > > *) There should be a go-to place for such reusable enterprise parts at > Apache. Like javamail, the tx-mgr, the specs, config, xbean, etc. > > *

Re: "Umbrella" discussion

Yes, I gonna tackle this with a broader explanation. Btw, I don't agree with the 2 weeks. If you would apply this rule to other topics then TomEE8 would clearly not happen. This is a discussion where everyone has a say and should be finished with either a clear outcome or a standard vote if ther

"Umbrella" discussion

Mark you'd like us to talk about making TomEE an umbrella or not. I think it's probably best you frame up and lead the discussion as you're the most passionate about it and I won't do it justice. I'd like to suggest that we give it two weeks. If the conversation dies out, we need to read it a