The PR has been merged.
Thanks everyone for voting.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 4:25 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> why -> for consistency accross our coupled communities
> why does it matter if it is in G for T? ->
why -> for consistency accross our coupled communities
why does it matter if it is in G for T? -> it doesn't
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Book
2018-04-12 15:56 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead :
> we already include libraries from geronimo, e.g. javamail, s
we already include libraries from geronimo, e.g. javamail, so why does
it matter where the library resides as long as it can be included in the
package
On 11/04/2018 15:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
Hi Matthew,
No, technicall there are a lot of small things to do before it can be
"included" b
Hi Matthew,
No, technicall there are a lot of small things to do before it can be
"included" but the main blocker for me is that the exact same project
is created at geronimo (actually this code was designed to be owned by
geronimo and the artifact imported in tomee).
Since G will have it I would
Hi David,
Thanks for the invitation to vote. I don't want to vote because I am
not sure I have enough knowledge to be able to do so.
My gut feeling would probably be to side with Mark and Romain as they
have been very supportive with my queries about TomEE and they have
shown deep technica
2018-04-10 9:24 GMT+02:00 Rudy De Busscher :
> Sorry Romain but I still have doubts if the code is really reusable, like
> that you can just add it to WildFly or Payara and that it works. (like
> Geronimo Config for example)
It will support the CDI+servlet support OOTB, the PR brings the
servlet/E
Sorry Romain but I still have doubts if the code is really reusable, like
that you can just add it to WildFly or Payara and that it works. (like
Geronimo Config for example)
Things like integrating with @RolesAllowed is not standardized (except
using JASPIC maybe which I tried but I had other issu
Le 10 avr. 2018 05:23, "David Blevins" a écrit :
Officially closing the vote. Thanks for the patience everyone. As
mentioned in the other vote, this one needed some good discussion and a bit
of extra time.
+1s
Andy Gumbrecht
David Blevins
Ivan Junckes Filho
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Jonathan Gallimo
Officially closing the vote. Thanks for the patience everyone. As mentioned
in the other vote, this one needed some good discussion and a bit of extra time.
+1s
Andy Gumbrecht
David Blevins
Ivan Junckes Filho
Jean-Louis Monteiro
Jonathan Gallimore
Thiago Veronezi
+0
Rudy De Busscher
-1s
Mark
