Thanks Jon. I'll create an issue to dig into it and fix it.
Le jeu. 5 janv. 2023, 10:40, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> +1, with the note that we seem to have a number of bcprov jars included:
>
> * bcprov-jdk15on-1.70.jar
> * bcprov-jdk15to18-1.70.jar
> *
+1, with the note that we seem to have a number of bcprov jars included:
* bcprov-jdk15on-1.70.jar
* bcprov-jdk15to18-1.70.jar
* bcprov-jdk18on-1.71.jar
Not sure if that is intended, but maybe needs some cleanup for the next
release.
Jon
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:53 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro
Thanks Jean-Louis for your answer,
So it looks like https://github.com/apache/tomcat-jakartaee-migration
is the recommended to migrate an EE 8 war archive into an Jakarta EE 8
equivalent.
Is that correct ?
if so then i'll try it to see if TomEE 9.0.0 works with our web apps
Alex
Le mer. 4
Hi Alexandre,
After some experiments, this tool is so limited that we decided to neither
advise nor support it. It's then not embedded in TomEE.
I wrote some notes here https://tomee.apache.org/javax-to-jakarta.html
Hope it helps
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
Hi there,
And happy new year to TomEE contributors!
I wish I could give this TomEE 9.0.0 release candidate a try, but all
my web apps currently still have EE dependencies on javax namespace.
Where is the tool which used to be mentioned to convert an existing
.war having EE dependencies into a
+1. Thank you for putting this release together!
-David
> On Jan 3, 2023, at 1:53 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm very proud to call a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0 final. It's been
> almost a year since we certified the server using a bytecode enhancement
> approach.
+1 binding.
Thank you all!
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 5:25 AM Thomas Andraschko <
andraschko.tho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Am Mi., 4. Jan. 2023 um 12:17 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla >:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, dem 04.01.2023 um 12:15 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis
+1 (non-binding)
Am Mi., 4. Jan. 2023 um 12:17 Uhr schrieb Richard Zowalla :
> +1 (binding)
>
> Am Mittwoch, dem 04.01.2023 um 12:15 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro:
> > My own +1
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
> > On
+1 (binding)
Am Mittwoch, dem 04.01.2023 um 12:15 +0100 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro:
> My own +1
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 12:14 PM Martin Wiesner
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Best
> >
My own +1
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 12:14 PM Martin Wiesner wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Best
> Martin
>
>
> On 2023/01/03 09:53:20 Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm very proud to call a vote for
+1 (non-binding)
Best
Martin
On 2023/01/03 09:53:20 Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm very proud to call a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0 final. It's been
> almost a year since we certified the server using a bytecode enhancement
> approach. Even though it worked, it introduced a lot
+1
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023, 08:10 Mark Struberg wrote:
> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 03.01.2023 um 10:53 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm very proud to call a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0 final. It's been
> > almost a year since we certified
+1
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 03.01.2023 um 10:53 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm very proud to call a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0 final. It's been
> almost a year since we certified the server using a bytecode enhancement
> approach. Even though it worked, it introduced a lot of
Hi all,
I'm very proud to call a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0 final. It's been
almost a year since we certified the server using a bytecode enhancement
approach. Even though it worked, it introduced a lot of restrictions
especially with tooling (IDE, Arquillian, Embedded container, etc).
We
Alex,
This is good feedback/discussion but can you please reply in the thread I
started on this topic so we can all exchange there without messing up with
the vote thread.
This is a full TomEE release including Arquillian, Maven, TomEE Embedded,
etc. The staging repository is in the vote email
The Maven Repo is here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1208/
See vote mail :-)
Gruß
Richard
Am 3. November 2022 10:11:26 MEZ schrieb Alex The Rocker :
>Hello,
>
>I don't see how we can hope people migrating from TomEE 8 to TomEE 9
>unless there's a smooth
Hello,
I don't see how we can hope people migrating from TomEE 8 to TomEE 9
unless there's a smooth way to handle transition.
Most large web apps have tons of dependencies, not all are Jakarta ready.
Seriously, if we don't want the transition to take 5+ years, a
converter EE->Jakarta is needed,
Yes it's not part of the distribution. It was a prototype on my side so we
could bring the discussion up to the community.
There is no outcome for the moment. There are too many edge cases and
restrictions. I don't know if it's a good idea and if it would work for
real enterprise cases.
Le mer.
Hello,
I'm confused, as I don't find the webapps-ee/ directory in extracted
TomEE+ 9 RC1.
Do I miss something ?
How to test automatic Java EE compatibility tricks proposed by Jean-Louis?
Thanks,
Alex
Le mer. 2 nov. 2022 à 11:54, Jonathan Gallimore
a écrit :
>
> +1
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Oct 31,
+1
Jon
On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 10:06 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed, here is the vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0.RC1. This is a
> release candidate implementing Jakarta EE 9.1 and MicroProfile 5. It is
> fully passing MicroProfile 5 TCK and only
+1 (binding)
On 2022/10/31 10:06:07 Jean-Louis Monteiro wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed, here is the vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0.RC1. This is a
> release candidate implementing Jakarta EE 9.1 and MicroProfile 5. It is
> fully passing MicroProfile 5 TCK and only has a few failures for Jakarta
>
Hello,
+1
Thank:)
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 22:50 Cesar Hernandez wrote:
> +1 (binding)
> Thank you !
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 17:26 Jean-Louis Monteiro >
> wrote:
>
> > my own +1 (binding)
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
>
+1 (binding)
Thank you !
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 17:26 Jean-Louis Monteiro
wrote:
> my own +1 (binding)
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:07 PM David Blevins
> wrote:
>
> > Looks good.
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
my own +1 (binding)
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 6:07 PM David Blevins wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> +1
>
> Thanks for putting this release together!
>
>
> -David
>
>
> > On Oct 31, 2022, at 3:06 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>
Looks good.
+1
Thanks for putting this release together!
-David
> On Oct 31, 2022, at 3:06 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed, here is the vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0.RC1. This is a
> release candidate implementing Jakarta EE 9.1 and MicroProfile 5. It is
>
if i'am right, these were superseded by other updates:
- link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3980[TOMEE-3980] HSQLDB
2.7.0
- link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4019[TOMEE-4019] HSQLDB
2.7.0
- link:https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-4039[TOMEE-4039] Hibernate
+1 to ship but the release note has some entries that I believe should be
removed.
Hsqldb 2.7.0
Hsqldb workaround
I can send the exact list of non included changes tomorrow if you want to
remove them.
Swell
On Mon 31 Oct 2022 at 11:06, Jean-Louis Monteiro
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed,
Hi all,
As discussed, here is the vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0.RC1. This is a
release candidate implementing Jakarta EE 9.1 and MicroProfile 5. It is
fully passing MicroProfile 5 TCK and only has a few failures for Jakarta
TCK, hence the release candidate.
This is a jakarta namespace compatible
Vote closed but adding a +1 from me.
Thank you, Jean-Louis for putting this together!
-David
> On Jul 5, 2022, at 1:10 AM, Zowalla, Richard
> wrote:
>
> Thanks Jon!
>
> Both should be fixed now :)
>
> Am Montag, dem 04.07.2022 um 13:13 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro:
>> Thanks Jon,
>>
Thanks Jon!
Both should be fixed now :)
Am Montag, dem 04.07.2022 um 13:13 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro:
> Thanks Jon,
>
> Created 2 issues (TOMEE-4007 and TOMEE-4008) under
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3862
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>
Thanks Jon,
Created 2 issues (TOMEE-4007 and TOMEE-4008) under
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3862
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Mon, Jul 4, 2022 at 12:46 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
+1
Couple of notes:
* woodstox-core appears to have gone _back_ some versions (6.2.4 -> 5.2.1)
* something is pulling in ASM as opposed to using the xbean-asm9-shaded
I don't think either of these should block the release, but we ought to
have a look as development moves forward.
Thanks for
+1 (non-binding)
Am Do., 30. Juni 2022 um 09:19 Uhr schrieb Wiesner, Martin <
martin.wies...@hs-heilbronn.de>:
> +1
>
> Best
> Martin
> —
> https://twitter.com/mawiesne
>
> > Am 29.06.2022 um 22:07 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> >
> > My own +1 (binding)
> > --
> >
+1
Best
Martin
—
https://twitter.com/mawiesne
> Am 29.06.2022 um 22:07 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro :
>
> My own +1 (binding)
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 9:54 PM Cesar Hernandez
> wrote:
>
>> +1 thank
My own +1 (binding)
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 9:54 PM Cesar Hernandez
wrote:
> +1 thank you!
>
> El mié, 29 jun 2022 a las 5:59, Daniel Dias Dos Santos (<
> daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com>) escribió:
>
> > Hi
> >
+1 thank you!
El mié, 29 jun 2022 a las 5:59, Daniel Dias Dos Santos (<
daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Hi
>
> +1
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022, 19:01 Jean-Louis Monteiro
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As discussed, here is the vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8. This milestone
> >
Hi
+1
Thanks
On Tue, Jun 28, 2022, 19:01 Jean-Louis Monteiro
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As discussed, here is the vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8. This milestone
> differs from previous 9.x in the sense that we migrated all TomEE code to
> the new jakarta namespace. Previously, we used bytecode
Thanks JL for the fight in preparing this milestone!
Here is my vote: +1 (binding)
[x] *.asc signature checks
gpg --batch --verify apache-tomee-9.0.0-M8-microprofile.tar.gz.asc
apache-tomee-9.0.0-M8-microprofile.tar.gz
gpg: Signatur vom Di 28 Jun 2022 10:06:21 CEST
gpg:mittels
Hi,
As discussed, here is the vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M8. This milestone
differs from previous 9.x in the sense that we migrated all TomEE code to
the new jakarta namespace. Previously, we used bytecode relocation but most
of the integration was broken (tests, arquillian, etc).
We are still
39 matches
Mail list logo
