Agreed. Thanks for that. Rolling now!
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:14 AM David Blevins
wrote:
> I’m fine if we don’t. Ok for it to go to maven central, but that and the
> webapp dists should probably be omitted from the downloads dir and page.
>
> We definitely discussed and agreed to yank the weba
I’m fine if we don’t. Ok for it to go to maven central, but that and the
webapp dists should probably be omitted from the downloads dir and page.
We definitely discussed and agreed to yank the webapps. It will take work
to get them out of the build, till then we should just stop promoting them.
Just noticed the openejb-standalone server doesn't boot. Should we even
include this?
Jon
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:04 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes. Here's the full set from the plus binary:
>
>
> FastInfoset-1.2.16.jar
> activemq-broker-5.15.10.jar
> active
Yes. Here's the full set from the plus binary:
FastInfoset-1.2.16.jar
activemq-broker-5.15.10.jar
activemq-client-5.15.10.jar
activemq-jdbc-store-5.15.10.jar
activemq-kahadb-store-5.15.10.jar
activemq-openwire-legacy-5.15.10.jar
activemq-protobuf-1.1.jar
activemq-ra-5.15.10.jar
batchee-jbatch-0.5
Hi All,
I'm cancelling this vote and re-rolling. I'll call another vote once I have
new binaries staged for review.
Thanks
Jon
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:54 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here's a first attempt at roll of a TomEE 8.0.0. Please can yo
We excluded the soap jar, right?
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:52 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've added ECL 1, referencing ECJ, and EPL 2, referencing Jakarta
> Activation, Jakarta XML Bind API, Jakarta XML SOAP API. Does that sound
> right?
>
> Jon
>
> On Thu, Sep
I've added ECL 1, referencing ECJ, and EPL 2, referencing Jakarta
Activation, Jakarta XML Bind API, Jakarta XML SOAP API. Does that sound
right?
Jon
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:54 PM David Blevins
wrote:
> Had a longer response but the planet started boarding and now I have to
> start again on ce
I added a:
deleteWithRetry(file:
paths.findTomEELibJar('jakarta.activation-api'))
to the SetupCommand.groovy.
Turns out that works better than:
deleteWithRetry(file:
paths.findOpenEJBWebJar('jakarta.activation-api'))
I'm quite tired :)
Jon
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:47 AM Dav
Do tell the mystical secret that lead to the exclusions aligning for our
binaries most divine.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:31 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, got further. Hopefully now just update the license file, and then roll
> the release.
>
> Jon
>
> On Fri,
Ok, got further. Hopefully now just update the license file, and then roll
the release.
Jon
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:23 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tried that, right next to where swizzle-stream is removed - get this - it
> didn't work. Also tried the install
I appreciate it. Been hacking away with mvn dependency:tree for what feels
like ages now. Adding the on that bom pom.xml seems to make no
difference. Adding the exclusion to everywhere the bom was referenced in
the whole project, and it still shows up in the tree. :-O
Jon
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at
Tried that, right next to where swizzle-stream is removed - get this - it
didn't work. Also tried the installer - same. I fear my sanity is leaving
me...
Jon
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:19 AM David Blevins
wrote:
> Somewhere in here:
>
> -
>
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/tomee/ap
Somewhere in here:
-
https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/tomee/apache-tomee/src/main/groovy/commands/SetupCommand.groovy#L58
Hello from SFO baggage claim in route to CodeOne! :)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:00 PM David Blevins
wrote:
> If you find it too difficult a plan b could be to hac
I haven’t tried anything like this in years, but I think there’s a maven
dependency plugin command that produces a graph; grepping this for the problem
child may show all the paths to it.
Hope this might help...
David Jencks
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 12, 2019, at 4:07 PM, Jonathan Gallimor
That's a good suggestion, thank you. Must admit, I'm surprised. I thought
the whole bom thing was meant to make this easier. I must be missing
something.
Jon
On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:00 AM David Blevins
wrote:
> If you find it too difficult a plan b could be to hack the Setup (or
> whatever i
If you find it too difficult a plan b could be to hack the Setup (or
whatever it’s called) java code that turns the war files into the assembly.
I.e. add a line to delete it.
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:46 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If anyone knows how to exclud
If anyone knows how to exclude jakarta.activation-api in the new bom
module, I'd sure appreciate the help. I'd expect
jakarta.activation
jakarta.activation-api
to work, but it seems like no matter where I exclude it, it keeps popping
up.
Jon
On Thu
Awesome, thanks for the detail. I'm working on the PR now. I post updates
here as I have them. Intention is to have take 2 rolled by the end of the
evening.
Have a safe flight!
Jon
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:55 PM David Blevins
wrote:
> Plane, but planet works too — although a slight exaggerati
Plane, but planet works too — although a slight exaggeration :)
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:53 PM David Blevins
wrote:
> Had a longer response but the planet started boarding and now I have to
> start again on cell :)
>
> Agree with all your removals. Note on Jakarta activation 1.2, we’ll want
>
Had a longer response but the planet started boarding and now I have to
start again on cell :)
Agree with all your removals. Note on Jakarta activation 1.2, we’ll want
to eventually switch to Geronimo Activation 1.2 when we get that ready.
We need to update the LICENSE and NOTICE files of each d
Here's the same analysis on TomEE 7.0.6:
javax.activation:
- lib/activation-1.1.jar
- lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar
javax.xml.stream:
- lib/stax-api-1.0-2.jar
- lib/javaee-api-7.0-1.jar
javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class, javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class
and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpoin
-Pquick skips quite a lot of stuff, including examples. In your case, it
was also skipping the itests module, and Maven isn't able to get those from
Maven central (yet). The command I ran here, with a clean ~/.m2/repository
took 58 minutes.
Jon
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:24 PM Emerson Castañeda w
Hi Jon
Thank you for your reply
I am building directly from the repo on the tag (tomee-8.0.0)
I have re-run the build removing -Pquick
Now the process is going further, right now, (49/322) and going, it usually
takes about 25 minutes, I'm not sure why it is too long.
Thanks
Emerson
On Thu,
> On Sep 12, 2019, at 1:03 PM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> Also, I'll take a look at openejb-client, but I'm not too sure what do with
> this conflict:
>
> javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class, javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class
> and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class:
Hi Emerson,
My build on a clean VM worked here. For reference, I ran:
mvn -Dsurefire.useFile=false -DdisableXmlReport=true -DuniqueVersion=false
-ff -Dassemble -DskipTests -DfailIfNoTests=false clean install | tee
build.log
(note, no -Pquick)
Cheers!
Jon
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:30 PM Jonath
Also, I'll take a look at openejb-client, but I'm not too sure what do with
this conflict:
javax/xml/ws/EndpointReference.class, javax/xml/ws/WebServiceFeature.class
and javax/xml/ws/wsaddressing/W3CEndpointReference.class:
- javaee-api-8.0-2.jar
- openejb-client-8.0.0.jar
Any thoughts?
Jon
On
Hi David!
Thanks for pointing this out. I've got the list of duplicate - I'd
appreciate yours (and anyone else's) view on the conflicts below:
Full set of duplicate classes is here:
https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/9f653f4fa3aec515051f6cd76af7c48f
Essentially we have the following conflicts:
Hi Emerson,
Can you try your build again, but without the -Pquick parameter?
Thanks
Jon
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:30 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Emerson!
>
> Thanks for taking the time to review this! I assume you're building from
> the source zip? I'll te
Will do! Thanks for pointer.
Jon
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 7:39 PM David Blevins
wrote:
>
> > On Sep 12, 2019, at 7:09 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > ADD geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.jar [47.47 ko]
> > ADD geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1.jar [223.30
> On Sep 12, 2019, at 7:09 AM, Jonathan Gallimore
> wrote:
>
> ADD geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.jar [47.47 ko]
> ADD geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec-1.7.1.jar [223.30 ko]
> ADD geronimo-jpa_2.2_spec-1.0.jar [128.50 ko]
Befor the reroll, do a quick check to see if any of the above are alread
Hi Emerson!
Thanks for taking the time to review this! I assume you're building from
the source zip? I'll test it on a clean box. You won't see the 8.0.0
artifacts on Maven central until the release passes, but there are
available in the staging repository -
https://repository.apache.org/content/r
I am getting this error during the build
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project openejb-core: Could not resolve
dependencies for project org.apache.tomee:openejb-core:jar:8.0.0: The
following artifacts could not be resolved:
org.apache.tomee:openejb-itests-app:jar:8.0.0,
org.apache.openejb.ite
I've spent some time reviewing:
* Build looks ok
* Libraries added and licenses look ok
* Upgraded a production application to this RC running on Java 11 - looks
good
* Getting a RAT report has proved to be a pain. Running RAT standalone
produces this report:
https://gist.github.com/jgallimore/be3
Thanks for the update, Jonathan.
+1
El jue., 12 sept. 2019 a las 8:09, Jonathan Gallimore (<
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Hi
>
> To assist with the review - here are the library changes from 8.0.0-M3:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1145/tomee-8.0.0/DIFF.t
Hi
To assist with the review - here are the library changes from 8.0.0-M3:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1145/tomee-8.0.0/DIFF.txt
To save you clicking, here's the content:
apache-tomee 8.0.0 webprofile
ADD geronimo-activation_1.1_spec-1.1.jar [47.47 ko]
ADD geronimo
Hi All,
Here's a first attempt at roll of a TomEE 8.0.0. Please can you take a
careful look, review, test and provide feedback.
Maven Repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1145
Binaries & Source:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1145/tomee-
36 matches
Mail list logo