Well to be totally honest I don't see what we gain from it but if you
want to try just do!
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2013/11/8 David Blevins :
> Not ideal
Not ideal, but at this point I'm willing to try anything at least once.
I'm more curious to see if it works than anything.
-David
On Nov 7, 2013, at 11:09 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Mens well have 2 trunks with same code...im not in love
> Le 8 nov. 2013 08:02, "David Blevins" a écrit :
Mens well have 2 trunks with same code...im not in love
Le 8 nov. 2013 08:02, "David Blevins" a écrit :
> Heads up, making the branch for 1.6.0.
>
> As sort of a crazy idea, I thought it might be interesting to branch for
> 1.6.1 now as well. Our intention would be to get this out *immediately*
Heads up, making the branch for 1.6.0.
As sort of a crazy idea, I thought it might be interesting to branch for 1.6.1
now as well. Our intention would be to get this out *immediately* after 1.6.0
and I think it might help confidence that this will actually occur if we
effectively start that re
