Re: Git time?

2014-10-08 Thread Daniel Cunha
David, Daniel needs your feedback. The issue is 'waiting for user' ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8374). On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Andy Gumbrecht wrote: > Cool, I'll start preparing some docs for the site. > > Andy. > > > On 20/09/2014 20:09, David Blevins wrote: > >> On S

Re: Git time?

2014-09-20 Thread Andy Gumbrecht
Cool, I'll start preparing some docs for the site. Andy. On 20/09/2014 20:09, David Blevins wrote: On Sep 20, 2014, at 11:02 AM, David Blevins wrote: Been a good 20+ days. All feedback positive or neutral. I'll poke Infra and get the show started! JIRA filed asking for next steps: -

Re: Git time?

2014-09-20 Thread David Blevins
On Sep 20, 2014, at 11:02 AM, David Blevins wrote: > Been a good 20+ days. All feedback positive or neutral. I'll poke Infra and > get the show started! JIRA filed asking for next steps: - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8374 > > On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:58 AM, David Blevins w

Re: Git time?

2014-09-20 Thread David Blevins
Been a good 20+ days. All feedback positive or neutral. I'll poke Infra and get the show started! -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:58 AM, David Blevins wrote: > We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all th

Re: Git time?

2014-08-28 Thread Andy Gumbrecht
Yes, it's similar to the Tomitribe flow. It also highlights the down side to Git - Missing any step will cause you headaches :-\ Getting used to it takes a while... On 28/08/2014 09:13, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: https://deltaspike.apache.org/suggested-git-workflows.html is good Romain Mann

Re: Git time?

2014-08-28 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
https://deltaspike.apache.org/suggested-git-workflows.html is good Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-08-28 8:48 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht : > There is some u

Re: Git time?

2014-08-27 Thread Andy Gumbrecht
There is some useful info here: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/ But in the short-run we'll need some good documentation to get people started on the site. Andy. -- Andy Gumbrecht https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Git time?

2014-08-27 Thread Andy Gumbrecht
+0 Happy working with both so far. If we use GIT then the workflow should be defined - Probably https://www.atlassian.com/git/workflows#!workflow-gitflow Andy. -- Andy Gumbrecht https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: Git time?

2014-08-27 Thread Jeff Genender
Do it… its log overdue ;—) Jeff On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:58 AM, David Blevins wrote: > We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the > merging we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right time to > switch to git. > > Pull requests from Github would

Re: Git time?

2014-08-27 Thread Daniel Cunha
+1 for git. :) On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 7:54 PM, helio frota <00h...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > +1 - I'm in favour of moving to git. > > > > Jon > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Da

Re: Git time?

2014-08-27 Thread helio frota
+1 On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 - I'm in favour of moving to git. > > Jon > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:58 PM, David Blevins > wrote: > > > We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the > > merging

Re: Git time?

2014-08-27 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
+1 - I'm in favour of moving to git. Jon On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:58 PM, David Blevins wrote: > We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the > merging we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right time > to switch to git. > > Pull requests from Githu

Re: Git time?

2014-08-27 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
+0 (really neutral don't care) Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-08-27 18:10 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro : > I'm fine with either way to work. > But it's

Re: Git time?

2014-08-27 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
I'm fine with either way to work. But it's true that for 1.x and 2.x maintenance, it's way either with GIT. JLouis -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Thiago Veronezi wrote: > +1 for git. > Local branches make ever

Re: Git time?

2014-08-27 Thread Thiago Veronezi
+1 for git. Local branches make everything much easier. []s, Thiago On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:58 AM, David Blevins wrote: > We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the > merging we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right time > to switch to git.

Re: Git time?

2014-08-27 Thread Chris Christo
embrace git +1 Chris Christo { twitter.com/christokios } { github.com/christokios } On 27 Aug 2014, at 23:58, David Blevins wrote: > We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the > merging we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right time to >

Git time?

2014-08-27 Thread David Blevins
We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the merging we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right time to switch to git. Pull requests from Github would get a lot easier as well. Thoughts? -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.to