David,
Daniel needs your feedback.
The issue is 'waiting for user' (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8374).
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Andy Gumbrecht
wrote:
> Cool, I'll start preparing some docs for the site.
>
> Andy.
>
>
> On 20/09/2014 20:09, David Blevins wrote:
>
>> On S
Cool, I'll start preparing some docs for the site.
Andy.
On 20/09/2014 20:09, David Blevins wrote:
On Sep 20, 2014, at 11:02 AM, David Blevins wrote:
Been a good 20+ days. All feedback positive or neutral. I'll poke Infra and
get the show started!
JIRA filed asking for next steps:
-
On Sep 20, 2014, at 11:02 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> Been a good 20+ days. All feedback positive or neutral. I'll poke Infra and
> get the show started!
JIRA filed asking for next steps:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-8374
>
> On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:58 AM, David Blevins w
Been a good 20+ days. All feedback positive or neutral. I'll poke Infra and
get the show started!
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:58 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all th
Yes, it's similar to the Tomitribe flow.
It also highlights the down side to Git - Missing any step will cause
you headaches :-\
Getting used to it takes a while...
On 28/08/2014 09:13, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
https://deltaspike.apache.org/suggested-git-workflows.html is good
Romain Mann
https://deltaspike.apache.org/suggested-git-workflows.html is good
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-28 8:48 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht :
> There is some u
There is some useful info here: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
But in the short-run we'll need some good documentation to get people
started on the site.
Andy.
--
Andy Gumbrecht
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
http://www.tomitribe.com
+0 Happy working with both so far.
If we use GIT then the workflow should be defined - Probably
https://www.atlassian.com/git/workflows#!workflow-gitflow
Andy.
--
Andy Gumbrecht
https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
http://www.tomitribe.com
Do it… its log overdue ;—)
Jeff
On Aug 27, 2014, at 8:58 AM, David Blevins wrote:
> We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the
> merging we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right time to
> switch to git.
>
> Pull requests from Github would
+1 for git. :)
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 7:54 PM, helio frota <00h...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 - I'm in favour of moving to git.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Da
+1
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:13 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 - I'm in favour of moving to git.
>
> Jon
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:58 PM, David Blevins
> wrote:
>
> > We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the
> > merging
+1 - I'm in favour of moving to git.
Jon
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:58 PM, David Blevins
wrote:
> We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the
> merging we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right time
> to switch to git.
>
> Pull requests from Githu
+0 (really neutral don't care)
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-27 18:10 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro :
> I'm fine with either way to work.
> But it's
I'm fine with either way to work.
But it's true that for 1.x and 2.x maintenance, it's way either with GIT.
JLouis
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 6:02 PM, Thiago Veronezi
wrote:
> +1 for git.
> Local branches make ever
+1 for git.
Local branches make everything much easier.
[]s,
Thiago
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:58 AM, David Blevins
wrote:
> We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the
> merging we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right time
> to switch to git.
embrace git
+1
Chris Christo
{ twitter.com/christokios }
{ github.com/christokios }
On 27 Aug 2014, at 23:58, David Blevins wrote:
> We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the
> merging we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right time to
>
We were on the fence last time we talked git, but I wonder with all the merging
we'll need to do between 1.7 and 2.0, this might be the right time to switch to
git.
Pull requests from Github would get a lot easier as well.
Thoughts?
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.to
17 matches
Mail list logo