Richard, thanks for your return.
Em dom., 30 de jun. de 2024 às 13:12, Richard Zowalla
escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> TOMEE-3965 was created for the example „deltaspike-fullstack“ [1].
> This example was dropped on „main“ for several reasons (cf. TOMEE-4137)
> and I wouldn’t spend any time solving it on th
Daniel, thanks for your return.
Em dom., 30 de jun. de 2024 às 12:44, Daniel Dias Dos Santos <
daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com> escreveu:
> Hello Evaldo,
>
> In my opinion, you can use the DeltaSpike 2.0 , this contains a namespace
> for Jakarta instead of javax from 1.9.4.
>
> About the websi
Hi,
TOMEE-3965 was created for the example „deltaspike-fullstack“ [1].
This example was dropped on „main“ for several reasons (cf. TOMEE-4137) and I
wouldn’t spend any time solving it on the 9.x line.
However, you are right, that bval-evaluation examples uses an outdated
deltaspike version, whi
Hello Evaldo,
In my opinion, you can use the DeltaSpike 2.0 , this contains a namespace
for Jakarta instead of javax from 1.9.4.
About the website, sometimes it has not been updated to the version that is
in Maven. The most current version is 2.0, which contains adjustments for
Jakarta.
On Sun,
Richard, i have a question, a doubt, regarding ticket 3965 -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3965.
The latest stable version of the DeltaSpike library is 2.0.0. In the
examples -> bval-evaluation-redeployment sub-module,
version 1.3.0 is being used. I have updated to the latest version
