OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-27 Thread Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)
All, I was notified of the pull request below. Long story short: We need to choose a different JDK to run on our docker images. At the moment I'm not sure what all the choices are. When I looked at this before, I suggested Eclipse Temurin. Does anyone have a preference or others to consid

Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-28 Thread Jean-Louis Monteiro
Eclipse is fine. Thanks Le jeu. 28 avr. 2022 à 01:22, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) < jenki...@nationwide.com> a écrit : > All, > > I was notified of the pull request below. Long story short: We need to > choose a different JDK to run on our docker images. > > At the moment I'm not sure what all the

Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-28 Thread Zowalla, Richard
+1 Am Donnerstag, dem 28.04.2022 um 11:19 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: > Eclipse is fine. > Thanks > > Le jeu. 28 avr. 2022 à 01:22, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) < > jenki...@nationwide.com> a écrit : > > > All, > > > > I was notified of the pull request below. Long story short: We > > need

Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-28 Thread Swell
Azul Zulu or Coretto could be a choice too. What is the prerequisite ? JDK vs JRE ? Binary installer vs zip/tar archives vs container images ? Temurin seems to have container images https://github.com/adoptium/adoptium/issues/140 Azul Zulu seems to have container images too on docker hub. https:

Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-28 Thread Jonathan Gallimore
+1 On Thu, 28 Apr 2022, 10:19 Jean-Louis Monteiro, wrote: > Eclipse is fine. > Thanks > > Le jeu. 28 avr. 2022 à 01:22, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) < > jenki...@nationwide.com> a écrit : > > > All, > > > > I was notified of the pull request below. Long story short: We need to > > choose a differe

Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-28 Thread Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)
Swell, Excellent questions: What is the prerequisite: I can only speak for the docker images The main prerequisite that I would have is that there is an official image in this list: https://github.com/docker-library/official-images/tree/master/library JDK vs JRE: JRE would be preferr

Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-28 Thread Cesar Hernandez
> > Eclipse Temurin. +1 El jue, 28 abr 2022 a las 4:07, Jonathan Gallimore (< jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com>) escribió: > +1 > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2022, 10:19 Jean-Louis Monteiro, > wrote: > > > Eclipse is fine. > > Thanks > > > > Le jeu. 28 avr. 2022 à 01:22, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) < > > jenki..

Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-29 Thread Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)
Hello all, There is more information on the PR I noted earlier. Essentially, OpenJDK 17 is being dereplicated. In addition OpenJDK 8 and OpenJDK 11, "are not updated on an extreme priority." Given this new information, I propose the following: Move immediately to Temurin for Java 17. (There h

Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-29 Thread Zowalla, Richard
Hi, I think, that Alpine would be a great addition to shrink the images sizes if it isn't too much work. I am also wondering, if we should provide a Semeru/OpenJ9 runtime - but I guess, that there isn't too much need for it, so it is super low prio :D Gruß Richard Am Freitag, dem 29.04.2022 u

Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-29 Thread Alex The Rocker
Hello, I already use TomEE+ with IBM Semeru-based images (with Java 17) for a while, it works quite well. Note: it's based on our own CentOS 7.x image for legacy compatibility reasons. Of course that's quite "outdated" part of it, so nothing that I would recommend to anyone else ;) Thanks, Alex

Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-05-02 Thread Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)
__ Von: Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) Gesendet: Samstag, 30. April 2022 19:12:40 An: dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: Re: Re: Re: OpenJDK is no more? Alex, That explains why I did not see it, lol. All, I have created this PR for review: https://github.com/tomitribe/do

Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-05-02 Thread Zowalla, Richard
Rodney J (Rod) > Gesendet: Samstag, 30. April 2022 19:12:40 > An: dev@tomee.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Re: Re: OpenJDK is no more? > > Alex, > > That explains why I did not see it, lol. > > > > All, > > I have created this PR f

Re: Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-30 Thread Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)
Richard, I am fine with providing a Semeru/OpenJ9. Would we want that or 8, 11, and 17? I do not see an alpine image, so it would just be adding a ubuntu image. Rod. On 4/30/22, 1:30 AM, "Zowalla, Richard" wrote: Nationwide Information Security Warning: This is an EXTERNAL email. Use

Re: Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-30 Thread Alex The Rocker
Hi Rod, You won't find any Semeru/OpenJ9 image based on Alpine, because this JVM is not supporter on Alpine (alas...) Thanks, Alex Le sam. 30 avr. 2022 à 18:10, Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) a écrit : > > Richard, > > I am fine with providing a Semeru/OpenJ9. Would we want that or 8, 11, and > 17?

Re: Re: Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-30 Thread Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)
Alex, That explains why I did not see it, lol. All, I have created this PR for review: https://github.com/tomitribe/docker-tomee/pull/66 This is not final, so if we want to add Semeru, I just need to know what java versions we would like to add. Thank you, Rod. On 4/30/22, 11:16 AM, "A

AW: Re: Re: OpenJDK is no more?

2022-04-30 Thread Zowalla, Richard
Maybe 11 + 17 for OpenJ9/Semeru? ;) Thanks. Gruß Richard Von: Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) Gesendet: Samstag, 30. April 2022 19:12:40 An: dev@tomee.apache.org Betreff: Re: Re: Re: OpenJDK is no more? Alex, That explains why I did not see it, lol. All, I have

Re: OpenJDK is no more? [action required, please]

2022-05-06 Thread Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)
_ > Von: Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) > Gesendet: Samstag, 30. April 2022 19:12:40 > An: dev@tomee.apache.org > Betreff: Re: Re: Re: OpenJDK is no more? > > Alex, > > That explains why I did not see it, lol. &

Re: OpenJDK is no more? [action required, please]

2022-05-11 Thread Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod)
> Thanks. > > Gruß > Richard > > Von: Jenkins, Rodney J (Rod) > Gesendet: Samstag, 30. April 2022 19:12:40 > An: dev@tomee.a