There is even an open PR [1] by Romain to switch to Johnzon and some
discussion on a related JIRA with low activity since 2018 [2]
Might be worth to jump in the discussion and ask for any news on it?
[1] https://github.com/apache/activemq/pull/308
[2]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/AM
Okay so I already noticed this weird duplication of JSON-P/B
implementations in TomEE, and answer was that community has other
priorities.
So maybe I'll try something with "some other channel" (can't tell you
more ATM) to try to get some progress on this topic :)
Kind regards,
Alexandre
Le mar. 1
Yup, ActiveMQ has a compile dependency towards jackson. There was a
discussion in 2019 [1] about it on the mailing list.
[1]
http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Why-jackson-and-jonhzon-shipped-with-latest-TomEE-td4689451.html
Am Montag, den 18.01.2021, 22:43 + schrieb Jonathan Gallimor
Its a dependency bought in by ActiveMQ. I'm happy to look at what it'll
take to use Johnzon, but if memory serves me correctly, last time I looked,
it wasn't trivial. I agree that we should work towards that goal though.
Jon
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 10:33 PM Alex The Rocker
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> W
Hello,
Why is Jackson embedded in TomEE, while we have Johnzon providing both
JSON-P & JSON-B ?
Isn't it making TomEE fatter than needed, not mentioning double
maintenance/updating efforts ?
Kind regards,
Alexandre
Le lun. 18 janv. 2021 à 22:55, Cesar Hernandez a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I creat
Hi all,
I created the following JIRAS and also a PR is now available for review:
Update to Tomcat 8.5.61
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2958
Update to jackson 2.12.0
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2959
PR: https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/728
--
Atentamente:
César
