On 02/03/10 15:38, Mathias Bauer wrote:
I tend to agree that - whatever we will do - we probably won't get rid
of cygwin. Where we have to get rid of it is the building of the
normal modules.
As an example, if a developer is going to work on sw, he might want to
build sw and all c++ libraries
Thorsten Behrens wrote:
The story on win32 (and other, not-so-standard platforms I believe
you alluded to) is totally different, of course, but you won't fix
that by prohibiting sed awk - fixing the root cause here means
performing cross-compilation for those platforms.
(you need to
Mathias Bauer wrote:
I just wanted to point out that you seem to underestimate the value
of a less diverse build system. Most probably because you don't
have to maintain it. ;-)
Quite the contrary. I have to personally setup all the win32 build
prerequisites on each and every box or vm I
