Hi *!
Christian Lohmaier schrieb:
> As "official" opengrok on svn.services... still didn't adopt it, and I
> myself did miss it in the couple of days, I decided to setup opengrok
> again on pumbaa, but this time indexing the mercurial-repo (tip is
> indexed, but it also indexes the history)
Sorry,
Hi!
Takashi Ono schrieb:
> Hi Frank,
>
> I have a simple question.
>
> Can older milestones also be built with prebuilt-seamonkey?
>
[snip]
No, that's not possible. We have to workaround that on the Buildbots
with some scripting (the patch handling mechanism will work).
Regards,
Christian
--
Hi!
Thanks for the hint. The updater script stumbled over the unusal tag
/tags/OpenOffice_3_1_0 and so the update process is broken. I'll fix
that as fast as possible.
Regards,
Christian
Del Merritt schrieb:
> Dear Toolmeisters -
>
> OpenGrok currently only allows project selection of up to DEV
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
If we are renaming it that way, I think simply calling it "trunk" would
sound better. Calling it "Current Trunk" seems a bit awkward.
Yes, but I wanted trunk at the top of the projects list...
How about 'Current (trunk)' ?
Good ;-) Done.
Christian
--
How to report b
On 01/21/09 14:52, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Wed, 2009-01-21 at 13:58 +0100, Christian Lins wrote:
Stephan Bergmann schrieb:
On 01/21/09 12:34, Christian Lins wrote:
"Current" points to trunk, not to the most recent milestone. But
you're right, somehow the update script has
Stephan Bergmann schrieb:
On 01/21/09 12:34, Christian Lins wrote:
"Current" points to trunk, not to the most recent milestone. But
you're right, somehow the update script has not worked for Current...
Would it be possible to rename "Current" to "Current Trunk&qu
Hi!
"Current" points to trunk, not to the most recent milestone. But you're
right, somehow the update script has not worked for Current...
Christian
Eike Rathke schrieb:
Hi,
So far I assumed that at http://svn.services.openoffice.org/opengrok/
the Current project would always point to the l
Hi!
The OOO300_m5 is an old milestone (I think one of the Release Candidates
of 3.0), so probably no one is interested in that issue :-) Perhaps you
could reproduce it with a newer milestone (OOO300_m13 or DEV300_m37)?
Additionally, you should note that the WinXP2-Buildbot currently
disables a lo
On 12/09/08 14:43, Philipp Lohmann wrote:
[snip]
For many cases an alphabetical sort by
directory name would be helpful.
Probably, but afaik this is currently not possible with OpenGrok.
Example: search for Symbol "EditView"
lots of results and really fast, but the results are scattered all
On 12/07/08 01:18, T F wrote:
"Now you have two options to build the whole Office. You can either call
“dmake” in SRC_ROOT or you can go to the “instsetoo_native” directory and
use “build” that allows you to control the build process a bit better:
SRC_ROOT> cd instsetoo_n
Hi!
Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
I don't know if this is possible, but having a project named, say,
'latest' that always points to the latest milestone would be a great
addition.
I typically write a macro for my editor to simplify symbol lookup that
automatically launches a browser with the correct U
Hi!
On 12/03/08 18:09, Takashi Ono wrote:
OpenGrok is working very nicely, thank you Christian!
Never mind, that's my job :-)
And I wish xref can include trunk and CWSs in the future ...
Well, that would be a great feature, but it costs *enormous* space to
index CWSs. We're talking about
Hi!
Christian Lins schrieb:
in the openoffice.org opengrok, the History and Annotate features are
disabled. if you look at the start page, the individual milestones are
available as projects, which to me seems to be the root of the
difference in available features.
is there any reason why
Hi!
Michael Stahl schrieb:
So, I guess what I'd like to have is ViewVC with the additional
tweaks the gnome repo provides, e.g. when doing CWS development, I
frequently review changes like this:
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/ooo-build/branches/ooo-build-3-0/?view=query&dir=&file=&file_match=exact
Hi!
Christian Lohmaier openoffice.org> writes:
> Is anybody willing to host an opengrok instance? opengrok allows
> searching as well as browsing the sources as well as retrieving diffs
> for a given file.
> But it is not a full replacement for a web-interface to the
> repository. While you can q
15 matches
Mail list logo
