Re: [tools-dev] Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2009-12-07 Thread Philipp Lohmann
Kay Ramme wrote: If we have a perfect build system, all switches etc. would be reflected in a way, that would lead to a re-build. Which we won't ... -- "One SVN to rule them all, One SVN to check out from, One SVN to commit them all and on the harddisks bind them In Las Vegas where the serve

Re: [tools-dev] Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2009-12-07 Thread Kay Ramme
... I think a while ago I did discuss that we Björn already, so hopefully he has it on his list :-) Kay Stephan Bergmann wrote: On 12/07/09 14:41, Kay Ramme wrote: Stephan Bergmann wrote: (1) A new file x/z is added to the SCM. A file y/z already exists. Will all C/C++ files be re

Re: [tools-dev] Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2009-12-07 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 12/07/09 14:14, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:03:11 +0100 Stephan Bergmann wrote: Anyway, my main concern was one of false advertising. Unless we do offer a "full dependencies mode," one should not claim that the projected new build sy

Re: [tools-dev] Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2009-12-07 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 12/07/09 14:41, Kay Ramme wrote: Stephan Bergmann wrote: (1) A new file x/z is added to the SCM. A file y/z already exists. Will all C/C++ files be recompiled that #include "z" and have -Ix before -Iy on their compiler command lines? Isn't it, that you have a difficult to maintain build ap

Re: [tools-dev] Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2009-12-07 Thread Kay Ramme
Hi Stephan, Stephan Bergmann wrote: (1) A new file x/z is added to the SCM. A file y/z already exists. Will all C/C++ files be recompiled that #include "z" and have -Ix before -Iy on their compiler command lines? Isn't it, that you have a difficult to maintain build approach if you supply

Re: [tools-dev] Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2009-12-07 Thread bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 14:03:11 +0100 Stephan Bergmann wrote: > Anyway, my main concern was one of false advertising. Unless we do > offer a "full dependencies mode," one should not claim that the > projected new build system will generally make bisectional > bug-hunting or resync possible without

Re: [tools-dev] Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2009-12-07 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 12/07/09 12:27, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:51:07 +0100 Stephan Bergmann wrote: (1) A new file x/z is added to the SCM. A file y/z already exists. Will all C/C++ files be recompiled that #include "z" and have -Ix before -Iy on their

Re: [tools-dev] Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2009-12-07 Thread bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 11:51:07 +0100 Stephan Bergmann wrote: > (1) A new file x/z is added to the SCM. A file y/z already exists. > Will all C/C++ files be recompiled that #include "z" and have -Ix > before -Iy on their compiler command lines? If one regenerates dependencies, yes. The question is

Re: [tools-dev] Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2009-12-07 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 12/04/09 17:52, bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany wrote: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/building_openoffice_org_with_gnu Citing from there: "All modern SCM -- and that includes Mercurial, which we are using now -- support bisectional bug-hunting. However, this is

[tools-dev] Building OpenOffice.org with GNU make

2009-12-04 Thread bjoern michaelsen - Sun Microsystems - Hamburg Germany
Hi Lists, The Build Environment Effort Team(1) has implemented a proof-of-concept on how to build OpenOffice.org using GNU make. The rationale for this is explained in this blogpost on GullFOSS: http://blogs.sun.com/GullFOSS/entry/building_openoffice_org_with_gnu The Build Environment Effort Tea