Hi Ian,
Ian Clatworthy wrote:
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Sure, but there is no need to rely on heuristics where none is needed.
Heuristics are good enough in many cases. Metadata + heuristics is
better though.
Back to the original use case which triggered this thread. If you do
rename of
On 10/06/09 14:02, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
How should any SCM detect filesystem only renames? This is just asked to
much. You have to use hg rename, of course. Anything else would have
to rely on heuristics which might fail, hardly something a SCM can do.
*Everything* an SCM does when it
Hi Stephan,
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 10/06/09 14:02, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
How should any SCM detect filesystem only renames? This is just asked to
much. You have to use hg rename, of course. Anything else would have
to rely on heuristics which might fail, hardly something a SCM can
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 00:15 +0200, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi,
AFAIK the heuristic works only if the hash over the file is the same. A
slight change, for instance adapting the name of the file in the license
header (however stupid such a thing might be) will spoil the heuristic,
I
Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
the good news that hg (as well as the other DSCMs) is able to detect
these cases and do the right thing. Things should improve here RSN.
Does it really detect these cases or does that only work when hg
rename was being used. If I would have used only
Hi Heiner,
On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
Does it really detect these cases or does that only work when hg
rename was being used. If I would have used only filesystem commands to
rename files would hg recognize that?
How should any SCM detect filesystem only
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 09:31 +0900, Takashi Ono wrote:
Hi all,
I think if there exist recent changes in files being deleted in a integration
of a cws,
they should be automatically warned to RE. Is it considered in the standard
of
procedures?
The background is i#105542. The file
Hi,
the good news that hg (as well as the other DSCMs) is able to detect
these cases and do the right thing. Things should improve here RSN.
Regards,
Heiner
Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Sat, 2009-10-03 at 09:31 +0900, Takashi Ono wrote:
Hi all,
I think if there exist recent changes in files
Hi all,
I think if there exist recent changes in files being deleted in a integration
of a cws,
they should be automatically warned to RE. Is it considered in the standard of
procedures?
The background is i#105542. The file solenv/inc/wntgcci6.mk is deleted and
added with a
new name
