Re: [tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?

2009-10-07 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Hi Eric and Christian, so MacOSX is out of the picture with gcc-3.3 as well. Good. Now we just need a word from the *BSD side regarding gcc-3.4. My proposal still stands: - gcc-4.x.x is supported - gcc-3.3 is not longer supported, patches aren't any longer accepted - gcc-3.4 is deprecated,

Re: [tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?

2009-10-03 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 10:44 PM, eric b wrote: > Le 1 oct. 09 à 12:43, Jens-Heiner Rechtien a écrit : >>> >>> Aqua-OOo is not supported on Mac OS X 10.3 - at least I don't know >>> anyone who ever did an aqua build that would run on 10.3. >> >> So dropping gcc-3.3 would only affect X11-MacO

Re: [tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?

2009-10-01 Thread eric b
Hi Heiner, Le 1 oct. 09 à 12:43, Jens-Heiner Rechtien a écrit : Aqua-OOo is not supported on Mac OS X 10.3 - at least I don't know anyone who ever did an aqua build that would run on 10.3. So dropping gcc-3.3 would only affect X11-MacOSX. Is that one still relevant at all? In fact, nobod

Re: [tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?

2009-10-01 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Hi Christian, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi *, > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Jens-Heiner Rechtien > wrote: >> there is not yet a need to drop gcc-3.4 support I think, the usual compile >> problems happen with gcc-3.3 or older versions. GCC made a major (and very >> necessary) parser upda

Re: [tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?

2009-09-30 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi *, On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote: > > there is not yet a need to drop gcc-3.4 support I think, the usual compile > problems happen with gcc-3.3 or older versions. GCC made a major (and very > necessary) parser update from 3.3 to 3.4 and should have bumped up the m

Re: [tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?

2009-09-30 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Hi Yuri, thanks for the update! Bye Heiner Yuri Dario wrote: Hi, We have discussed dropping gcc-3.3 support for quite some time now, but we refrained from officially obsoleting it because OS/2 and MACOSX 10.3 support still depend on gcc-3.3, at least according to this list: http://wiki

Re: [tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?

2009-09-30 Thread Yuri Dario
Hi, >We have discussed dropping gcc-3.3 support for quite some time now, but >we refrained from officially obsoleting it because OS/2 and MACOSX 10.3 >support still depend on gcc-3.3, at least according to this list: >http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Compiler_versions_used_by_port_maint

Re: [tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?

2009-09-30 Thread Jens-Heiner Rechtien
Hi, there is not yet a need to drop gcc-3.4 support I think, the usual compile problems happen with gcc-3.3 or older versions. GCC made a major (and very necessary) parser update from 3.3 to 3.4 and should have bumped up the major version at that time. We have discussed dropping gcc-3.3 supp

[tools-dev] should we drop gcc3 support ?

2009-09-30 Thread Martin Hollmichel
Hi, obviously OOo doesn't compile any longer with gcc3, see http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=95511, should we now officially drop gcc3 ? Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org F