Re: Help from Mentors

We are correcting our LICENSE bundling to mirror what you've sent. Now, on NOTICE file, we are going by the statement at http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice >However, elements such as the copyright notifications embedded within BSD and MIT licenses need not be duplicated in

Re: Help from Mentors

Another useful doc which was being worked on as part of Kudu going through the same pains of its first release: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1eftfjrWpOG-dRkw9dZWRfcj3p_qCeE5xC-G0Y5j29Ck/edit — Hitesh On Apr 8, 2016, at 9:03 AM, Gino Bustelo wrote: > I'm reading

Re: Help from Mentors

Thats actually required for any bundled dependency that has a non ALv2 license even the permissible ones such as BSD, MIT, etc ( not only LGPL ones ). The top-level license file is meant to call out the licenses for all the things that are being bundled. To summarize for the license files -

Re: Help from Mentors

I'm reading https://github.com/zeromq/jeromq/blob/master/COPYING.LESSER#L91 and seems to me that we need to ship our bin distros with copies of the LGPL license. What is you all read? On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Gino Bustelo wrote: > @hitesh > > Awesome summary. This