I'm not aware of any -- can you point me to those compliance charts?
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:29 PM Chris Lemmons wrote:
> Agreed, weasel has been working quite well. At one point, though, we
> were part of a group that had CI reporting the rat results up to a
> larger group inside Apache, which
GH Issue Link: https://github.com/apache/trafficcontrol/issues/3557
Background
--
Edge caches can currently be assigned to delivery services in three ways:
- By Server Profile
- By Cache Group
- By Individual Cache
The mids of the assigned edges are chosen based only on the parent and
Should there be 2 type of CR-Config? A major (all) and minor (less
dangerous things)?
Currently seems like a few things gets propagated if you want it or not.
SSL, Steering and Federation. No CR-Config required.
Steve
On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 10:17 AM Derek Gelinas wrote:
> I agree with this for
I agree with this for this implementation, but I find myself wondering if
there's anything else that might be detached from the primary crconfig in order
to help automate things/separate them from more dangerous activities, like
disconnecting servers from services or setting them offline, that s
That sounds good to me! Thanks everyone!
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 4:28 PM Chris Lemmons wrote:
> I think the out-of-band solution might be the cleanest and safest.
> It's a bit more work, but it keeps things separate that should be
> separate. Additionally, it significantly reduces the risk that a
